From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D22CA9EC0 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582B820873 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:58:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 582B820873 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6T5-0006D6-Ev for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:58:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44157) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6Rx-00054h-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:56:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6Rw-0002xX-3w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:56:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iP6Rv-0002x9-S8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:56:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A581E36961 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id 18so3809918qka.3 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:56:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=QtNd0UMqofsV+XZWmGpconlIFxP5DQnlNLXPHI1qYVA=; b=FCPxIngkNFsowL0SgPTAuIH+6HJhn+l98jifsZT/M93ZJ3PeuAUY2ChXl35+PPTKBy 0MMaM7qUZhR+rR+PtFvZOSh3z99tDsmlC/XnYygnhrKyJdYwMx3GFsQd1SESEJg/fAg+ qBTCXvnYOTNi5Ekq4zVnL7Qgxie2zVbfr6Aeg4gp4umaLmgxCgUyaawvX069cWLhoVcK YWNCWOKbbDMBA3BQ85rqYGHovnYjxuWCAJ9PFAPj4iKXFKJcdYoD8L+GD1WfX/1NmVA6 GY1vEQ3G7uxca+CZuYK/DOZl/Qv4LGOzFzihOYJeeQTn46yUXoNu47wo70w8wJZwwExr ZAdw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVuvkczGi1C7hJcQ9xjT+7rsd9xQK8RKhsOuKPWsMsONZWKJ290 1+jWuMn5CG483rgQy1Vi4rC7Zeu/3i2sG3NhwxVkP/OODXLzPYZbSCXZbX38JY1pEN0/3aPXMc0 gzXkL12PumUVzjC4= X-Received: by 2002:a37:610f:: with SMTP id v15mr15487588qkb.98.1572274609945; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:56:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVqh1AavhfAL3N/XFU4xnwB0M3GWSLGvejcePz3nI6KDoPRMDZQjnEw5dr2p7IfEnb9i2/Zg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:610f:: with SMTP id v15mr15487560qkb.98.1572274609617; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-79-176-10-77.red.bezeqint.net. [79.176.10.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p17sm5696481qkm.135.2019.10.28.07.56.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:56:41 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: gengdongjiu Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 0/5] Add ARMv8 RAS virtualization support in QEMU Message-ID: <20191028104834-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20191026032447.20088-1-zhengxiang9@huawei.com> <20191027061450-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <6c44268a-2676-3fa1-226d-29877b21dbea@huawei.com> <20191028042645-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <1edda59a-8b3d-1eec-659a-05356d55ed22@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1edda59a-8b3d-1eec-659a-05356d55ed22@huawei.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, imammedo@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linuxarm@huawei.com, shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com, Xiang Zheng , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, james.morse@arm.com, xuwei5@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, lersek@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:50:21PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 2019/10/28 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> gets some testing. I'll leave this decision to the ARM maintainer. For > >>> ACPI parts: > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > >> Got it, Thanks for the Reviewed-by from Michael. > >> > >> Hi Michael, > >> According to discussion with QEMU community, I finished and developed the whole ARM RAS virtualization solution, and introduce the ARM APEI table in the first time. > >> For the newly created files, which are mainly about ARM APEI/GHES part,I would like to maintain them. If you agree it, whether I can add new maintainers[1]? thanks a lot. > >> > >> > >> [1]: > >> +ARM APEI Subsystem > >> +M: Dongjiu Geng > >> +M: Xiang zheng > >> +L: qemu-arm@nongnu.org > >> +S: Maintained > >> +F: hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.c > >> +F: include/hw/acpi/acpi_ghes.h > >> +F: docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst > >> > > I think for now you want to be a designated reviewer. So I'd use an R: > > tag. > > Thanks for the reply. > I want to be a maintainer for my newly created files, so whether I can use M: tag. I would like to contribute some time to maintain that, thanks a lot. This will fundamentally be up to Peter. Reviewing patches is generally the best way to become a maintainer, that's why I suggested the R: tag. > > > >>> > >>>> ---