From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC36C010CF for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D98E22491 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OoNpVG7L" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5D98E22491 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43378 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRxk7-0002DK-Bm for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:15:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54371) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRxiz-0001R6-DE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:14:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRxix-0005Ly-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:14:16 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:20051 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRxix-0005LO-EY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:14:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1572956054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2Rf2aLSW9Eb5cHks++WUHXq4M4VenR8g8GUYMn8HXwQ=; b=OoNpVG7LnMcHQ0OrdC1ukekFhEudi4T/wvOJMQiV1ZIQi2dXTespNIme9V9Z/w6osr0Wmc ra5ocIElAQ8Ok90L7lM7k9t18mmPbQQ6Kd7Iw78ISf7hRACmBFjzW8HwKZmszBfUufw2av M5ixgtkrHpQ1IbmXttP+hH4jA0LyAU0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-218-UQU3nn_QNJmODATmOa4tyw-1; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 07:14:09 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE2A107ACC2; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from work-vm (ovpn-117-86.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.86]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8F05C28D; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:13:59 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Laurent Vivier Subject: Re: [PATCH] global: Squash 'the the' Message-ID: <20191105121359.GA2781@work-vm> References: <20191104185202.102504-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <157290359988.27285.16497763825853147226@37313f22b938> <87ftj2kabe.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-MC-Unique: UQU3nn_QNJmODATmOa4tyw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, sstabellini@kernel.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, mjt@tls.msk.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, laurent@vivier.eu, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" * Laurent Vivier (lvivier@redhat.com) wrote: > On 05/11/2019 09:16, Alex Benn=E9e wrote: > >=20 > > no-reply@patchew.org writes: > >=20 > >> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20191104185202.102504-1-dgilbert= @redhat.com/ > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find th= e testing commands and > >> their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably rep= roduce it > >> locally. > >> > >> =3D=3D=3D TEST SCRIPT BEGIN =3D=3D=3D > >> #!/bin/bash > >> make docker-image-centos7 V=3D1 NETWORK=3D1 > >> time make docker-test-quick@centos7 SHOW_ENV=3D1 J=3D14 NETWORK=3D1 > >> =3D=3D=3D TEST SCRIPT END =3D=3D=3D > >> > >> TEST iotest-qcow2: 009 > >> TEST iotest-qcow2: 010 > >> ** > >> ERROR:/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/migration-test.c:903:wait_for_migration= _fail: assertion failed: (!strcmp(status, "setup") || !strcmp(status, "fail= ed") || (allow_active && !strcmp(status, "active"))) > >> ERROR - Bail out! ERROR:/tmp/qemu-test/src/tests/migration-test.c:903:= wait_for_migration_fail: assertion failed: (!strcmp(status, "setup") || !st= rcmp(status, "failed") || (allow_active && !strcmp(status, "active"))) > >> make: *** [check-qtest-aarch64] Error 1 > >> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > >=20 > > That's one I've been seeing intermittently on Travis since the > > softfreeze started. It was masked by the other regressions which are no= w > > fixed. >=20 > Could it be related with my patch? >=20 > 1bd71dce4bf2 runstate: ignore exit request in finish migrate state Possible but unlikely I think; lets see if I can reproduce it and get a backtrace; (It would be very nice if I could get that assertion to tell me what 'status' is; we know it's not setup or failed, and it may or may not be active; but what it is ....well that's anyones guess. Dave > Thanks, > Laurent -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK