On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:33:35AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/19/19 10:35 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:14 PM Aleksandar Markovic
> > <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:46 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > The following changes since commit f086f22d6c068ba151b0f6e81e75a64f130df712:
> > > > 
> > > >    Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/awilliam/tags/vfio-fixes-20191118.0' into staging (2019-11-18 21:35:48 +0000)
> > > > 
> > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > 
> > > >    https://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/tracing-pull-request
> > > > 
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6b904f1a528a6d8c21f7fbdeab13b9603d1b6df7:
> > > > 
> > > >    hw/mips/gt64xxx: Remove dynamic field width from trace events (2019-11-19 16:17:05 +0000)
> > > > 
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Pull request
> > > > 
> > > > Tracing fixes for MIPS.
> > > > 
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello, Stefan, Philippe, Peter.
> > > 
> > > This appears to be a duplicate of the pull request sent today by Philippe
> > > (and already applied by Peter just hours ago):
> > > 
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-11/msg02894.html
> > > 
> > > The patches from the two pull requests appear to be identical, except
> > > some minor details in commit messages: Stefan's versions contain
> > > "Message-Id:" identifiers, while Philippe's don't (my suggestion to
> > > Philippe is to include "Message-Id:" for all patches that are part of any
> > > pull request in future; this can be achieved effortlessly/automatically
> > > by applying patches using patchwork).
> > > 
> > > In summary, for this very situation, it looks to me we are all set, no need
> > > for Peter to process this pull request.
> > > 
> > 
> > And just another really friendly advice for Philippe: When you apply
> > some patches or a series to your pull request, just inform others
> > about that by replying to the patches or a series: "I applied XXX to
> > my queue/pull request" - this helps avoiding duplicate efforts like
> > it happened here. This is also reminder to me too, I didn't do it in
> > all cases of my applying to my my pull requests, and I should have,
> > but I will improve too.
> 
> You are totally correct, in a rush to get these patches merged before the
> release candidate get tagged, I neglected to reply to my series and let
> Stefan waste his time.
> 
> Stefan, I sincerely apologize and will make efforts so this won't happen
> again.

No problem, I just wanted to make sure we don't miss these patches.

Stefan