qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: ASM <asm@asm.pp.ru>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PCI memory sync question (kvm,dpdk,e1000,packet stalled)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:05:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191121140502.GX439743@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMmAVbXNMjk=FasuySEcUa0U8CqGkCghehsJsWbVV2VHCAPA-w@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2635 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 08:36:32PM +0300, ASM wrote:
> I trying solve the problem, with packets stopping (e1000,tap,kvm).
> My studies led to the following:
> 1. From flatview_write_continue() I see, what e1000 writes the number
> "7" to the STAT register.
> 2. The driver from target OS reads STAT register with number "7" and
> writes to the register the number "0".
> 3. From flatview_write_continue() (I make edits):
>             memcpy(ptr, buf, l);
>             new1=ptr[0xc];
>             usleep(100);
>             new2=ptr[0xc];
>             invalidate_and_set_dirty(mr, addr1, l);
>             new3=ptr[0xc];
> printf("Old: %i, new1, %i, new2: %i, new3: %i\n", old,new1,new2,new3);
> 
> I see what memory in first printf is "7", but after usleep() is "0".
> Do I understand correctly that this should not be? Or RCU lock
> suggests the ability to the multiple writers?
> 
> The problem is that qemu(e1000) writes the number 7, after which
> target(dpdk driver) reads 7, on the basis of this it writes the number
> 0, but as a result (extremely rarely), the value STATUS still remains
> 7. Therefore, packet processing is interrupted. This behavior is
> observed only on kvm (it is not observed on tcg).
> 
> Please help with advice or ideas.

Hi Leonid,
Could you be seeing weird behavior with KVM due to MMIO write
coalescing?

  static void e1000_mmio_setup(E1000State *d)
  {
      int i;
      const uint32_t excluded_regs[] = {
          E1000_MDIC, E1000_ICR, E1000_ICS, E1000_IMS,
          E1000_IMC, E1000_TCTL, E1000_TDT, PNPMMIO_SIZE
      };

      memory_region_init_io(&d->mmio, OBJECT(d), &e1000_mmio_ops, d,
                            "e1000-mmio", PNPMMIO_SIZE);
      memory_region_add_coalescing(&d->mmio, 0, excluded_regs[0]);
      for (i = 0; excluded_regs[i] != PNPMMIO_SIZE; i++)
          memory_region_add_coalescing(&d->mmio, excluded_regs[i] + 4,
                                       excluded_regs[i+1] - excluded_regs[i] - 4);
      memory_region_init_io(&d->io, OBJECT(d), &e1000_io_ops, d, "e1000-io", IOPORT_SIZE);
  }

MMIO write coalescing means that QEMU doesn't see the register writes
immediately.  Instead kvm.ko records them into a ring buffer and QEMU
processes the ring when the next ioctl(KVM_RUN) exit occurs.

See Linux Documentation/virt/kvm/api.txt "4.116
KVM_(UN)REGISTER_COALESCED_MMIO" for more details.

I don't really understand your printf debugging explanation.  It would
help to see the DPDK code and the exact printf() output.

Also, is DPDK accessing the e1000 device from more than 1 vCPU?

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-21 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAMmAVbWzrYWZBXwKxSd-f5SXmq6qP1ok8abvyKJhp3=REEaMPA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-11-20 17:36 ` PCI memory sync question (kvm,dpdk,e1000,packet stalled) ASM
2019-11-21 14:05   ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2019-11-27 12:39     ` ASM
2019-12-19 14:58       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-12-30 10:10         ` ASM
2020-01-02 11:05           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-05-23 12:47             ` Ding Hui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191121140502.GX439743@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
    --to=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=asm@asm.pp.ru \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).