From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C73AC432C3 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0583C206D7 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DvYBoJKT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0583C206D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXn8f-0003Yq-5F for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:08:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXn78-0002Hb-Nl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:07:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXn76-0002UF-NE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:07:17 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:32716 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXn76-0002To-Iu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:07:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1574345235; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dkvZ1w22jHCmGzCKE7i29gRYzALFF0sEi7DXEkYPW8c=; b=DvYBoJKT2YzqY0mtxuGDK3aWwTXcraV4uKg2d6dnDO4rkRNUEMzwjlmvJu5nGjjwbRBF2k 60NZ22YERMpdjp+bkHPncYI4bSki6blS75q+X60wzPHNtGTYQJ3dd06yEm+VCISQko64cP VTIE75kzs6Ky/d602SPxs2hibmw8ft8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-349-uiSBstdbM4iiFmxoI4OBNg-1; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:07:12 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C281800D45; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (dhcp-192-218.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.218]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3399A692AE; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:07:04 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck To: Janosch Frank Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Message-ID: <20191121150704.4d5a09ef.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191120114334.2287-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com> References: <20191120114334.2287-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> <20191120114334.2287-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-MC-Unique: uiSBstdbM4iiFmxoI4OBNg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.81 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:43:27 -0500 Janosch Frank wrote: > Secure guests no longer intercept with code 4 for an instruction > interception. Instead they have codes 104 and 108 for secure > instruction interception and secure instruction notification > respectively. >=20 > The 104 mirrors the 4, but the 108 is a notification, that something > happened and the hypervisor might need to adjust its tracking data to > that fact. An example for that is the set prefix notification > interception, where KVM only reads the new prefix, but does not update > the prefix in the state description. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > --- > target/s390x/kvm.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c > index 418154ccfe..58251c0229 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c > @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ > #define ICPT_CPU_STOP 0x28 > #define ICPT_OPEREXC 0x2c > #define ICPT_IO 0x40 > +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR 0x68 > +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOT 0x6c _NOTIF ? > =20 > #define NR_LOCAL_IRQS 32 > /* > @@ -151,6 +153,7 @@ static int cap_s390_irq; > static int cap_ri; > static int cap_gs; > static int cap_hpage_1m; > +static int cap_protvirt; > =20 > static int active_cmma; > =20 > @@ -336,6 +339,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s) > cap_async_pf =3D kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF); > cap_mem_op =3D kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP); > cap_s390_irq =3D kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ); > + cap_protvirt =3D kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED); You don't seem to do anything with this yet? > =20 > if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP) > || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { > @@ -1664,6 +1668,8 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu) > (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr); > switch (icpt_code) { > case ICPT_INSTRUCTION: > + case ICPT_PV_INSTR: > + case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOT: > r =3D handle_instruction(cpu, run); Doesn't handle_instruction() want to know whether it got a request for emulation vs a notification? > break; > case ICPT_PROGRAM: