On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:16:21 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 11/28/19 6:34 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 19:38:06 +0100
> > Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 11/27/19 7:25 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:  
> >>>
> >>> There's 0 (initiated), busy and operational and as far as I know we
> >>> implement neither.    
> >>
> >> That came out wrong...
> >> s/operational/not operational/
> >>
> >> We only implement "command initiated" / cc = 0
> >> We can never have busy, because we handle sclp calls synchronously.
> >> The spec does not give any indication when we could return "not
> >> operational". I guess that's just a free pass for hypervisors.  
> > 
> > Regardless, setcc(cpu, r) also feels a bit cleaner to me...  
> 
> Ok, do you want to change that while picking the patches up or shall I
> send a new version?

New version (of this patch), please :) Easier for me...