From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CB1C432C0 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FAA0206E1 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YJyBlLZD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3FAA0206E1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibsrg-0000BZ-2U for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:04:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibsoo-0007Kt-3x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:01:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibsol-0001hw-HQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:01:16 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:20861 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibsoj-0001fI-DQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:01:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575320467; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E6y/EuSSyYz1/XHfDFoP7Ofq/cY5irbE2G+NZwQHgWM=; b=YJyBlLZDPYG51Ri4ZRZrqKYJkQDMVk3GNqOq+3b70ZlI7VX9lBkNABs/ckT4UqAqykPyYm YbIynJ7FZiNgelUV9OsZyubdqf/5AsKrcMl8gNft5B0yTTx/NQxjVokpos3djc70BUdYM3 9zSFsUapKJK3ZU1vkzjIjGzLOivp7iE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-74-oHR8nB7KM56PiFC7d2tXPg-1; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:01:03 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F9A1005502; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-90.gru2.redhat.com [10.97.116.90]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB7910013A7; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 18:00:57 -0300 From: Eduardo Habkost To: Igor Mammedov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add -mem-shared option Message-ID: <20191202210057.GQ14595@habkost.net> References: <20191128141518.628245-1-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20191128141518.628245-3-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> <20191128172807.788e6aeb@redhat.com> <20191129110703.2b15c541@redhat.com> <04dadf85-cd35-fd37-9642-8087cba625bd@redhat.com> <20191129131652.6683b769@redhat.com> <528bb183-3d44-e541-8765-9c0e01f23157@redhat.com> <20191202083948.3e8bb134@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191202083948.3e8bb134@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-MC-Unique: oHR8nB7KM56PiFC7d2tXPg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , QEMU , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 08:39:48AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:46:12 +0100 > Paolo Bonzini wrote: >=20 > > On 29/11/19 13:16, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > As for "-m", I'd make it just an alias that translates > > > -m/mem-path/mem-prealloc =20 > >=20 > > I think we should just deprecate -mem-path/-mem-prealloc in 5.0. CCing > > Thomas as mister deprecation. :) >=20 > I'll add that to my series Considering that the plan is to eventually reimplement those options as syntactic sugar for memory backend options (hopefully in less than 2 QEMU releases), what's the point of deprecating them? --=20 Eduardo