From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE620C432C0 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D87120661 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ANkB/AT9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D87120661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51594 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5wC-0005O1-MS for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 06:01:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5oi-0002bB-KS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:54:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5ob-000338-Ki for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:53:59 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:45495 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic5ob-000317-1O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:53:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575370435; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M+XhWXtzgAHD83890r01RG1w45N1ChUn/mXqyManSr0=; b=ANkB/AT9nga7ouzyh+sxW/j94LeXUtLb5Ws0mpQ1AmcI+fDdIPj4PtBmW8RAhiWlqxgxZY SIuEiVA6o3pLu3xbvjSpplHzU6cSoG3cfJdqWZL59eOu+/0gUM4qHZlWqRA5RCdDdvgRCi 5gLfxiea5gcp2gmbs/rXHmGfcHzjtik= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-381-UaKXs29MNLGRNhdZcXppbg-1; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:53:54 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51363801E7B; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from work-vm (unknown [10.36.118.45]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2036060BFB; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:53:41 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? Message-ID: <20191203105341.GB3078@work-vm> References: <20191125185021.GB3767@work-vm> <20191126102600.GG556568@redhat.com> <20191126121416.GE2928@work-vm> <87k17ekhs9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: UaKXs29MNLGRNhdZcXppbg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , mszeredi@redhat.com, QEMU Developers , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , vgoyal@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We seem to be coming to the conclusion something that: a) It should live in the qemu tree b) It shouldn't live under contrib c) We'll create a new top level, i.e. 'daemons' d) virtiofsd will be daemons/virtiofsd Now, somethings I'm less clear on: e) What else would move into daemons? It was suggested that if we've got virtiofsd in there, then we should move libvhost-user - which I understand, but then it's not a 'daemons'. Are there any otehr daemons that should move? f) Should virtiofsd always be built (if the deps are installed)? Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK