From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F9C432C0 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E45A3205F4 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="i77bn/9C" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E45A3205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53342 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic83M-00078l-OE for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:17:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7xJ-0003dV-Lz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:11:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7xH-0005G5-Mo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:11:05 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:57864 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ic7xF-0005Bu-MY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:11:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575378659; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hm1pGm1KwcC8wCglvp9pxz/p0Wp5M+VQua/v1lYDDTM=; b=i77bn/9CIaB2yq+S4cMhjnFnAr/q2ACKtgNnzXpoe1BB9Ex0UZzOmnQRQpm8U134oo2thT 59RuRdweOL5TclBHO9jPe8X96KRlPmCYjkjKCK0sW8wTzAVxCLkjITj0YfTJsHmt7IBYbd HL4ERezkcrt5yD2Ow8jJnNaNMIf+Qts= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-308-u7Xbis8GP1yZlEIybIAvKw-1; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 08:10:56 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83FB9107ACC4; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from work-vm (unknown [10.36.118.45]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CD65D6A7; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 13:10:46 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Paolo Bonzini , groug@kaod.org Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? Message-ID: <20191203131046.GF3078@work-vm> References: <20191125185021.GB3767@work-vm> <20191126102600.GG556568@redhat.com> <20191126121416.GE2928@work-vm> <20191203130250.GD3078@work-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-MC-Unique: u7Xbis8GP1yZlEIybIAvKw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com, Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" * Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote: > On 03/12/19 14:02, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > >> It could be in fsdev/virtiofsd, > > fsdev is currently all 9p stuff, so that would seem very confusing. >=20 > Move it to fsdev/9p? Greg: Are you OK with us doing that, and then having fsdev/virtiofsd for our side of things? > >> but I agree with Daniel that at this > >> point the QEMU build system introduces baggage that you may not want f= or > >> virtiofsd. > > > > I've already got it wired up in contrib with qemu's build system > > so that doesn't seem to be an issue. The question is purely a 'where'= . >=20 > Oh I agree it's not an insurmountable problem. For a new project I may > not want to deal with the complicated rules.mak stuff; however, if > virtiofsd doesn't have to do anything complicated then it's your choice. Fortunately we don't seem to have touched that. Dave > Paolo >=20 -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK