From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:15:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205181532.46bee55c.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191129094809.26684-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 04:48:02 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Secure guests no longer intercept with code 4 for an instruction
> interception. Instead they have codes 104 and 108 for secure
> instruction interception and secure instruction notification
> respectively.
>
> The 104 mirrors the 4 interception.
>
> The 108 is a notification interception to let KVM and QEMU know that
> something changed and we need to update tracking information or
> perform specific tasks. It's currently taken for the following
> instructions:
>
> * stpx (To inform about the changed prefix location)
> * sclp (On incorrect SCCB values, so we can inject a IRQ)
> * sigp (All but "stop and store status")
> * diag308 (Subcodes 0/1)
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/kvm.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index ad6e38c876..3d9c44ba9d 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
> #define ICPT_CPU_STOP 0x28
> #define ICPT_OPEREXC 0x2c
> #define ICPT_IO 0x40
> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR 0x68
> +#define ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION 0x6c
>
> #define NR_LOCAL_IRQS 32
> /*
> @@ -151,6 +153,7 @@ static int cap_s390_irq;
> static int cap_ri;
> static int cap_gs;
> static int cap_hpage_1m;
> +static int cap_protvirt;
>
> static int active_cmma;
>
> @@ -342,6 +345,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
> cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF);
> cap_mem_op = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP);
> cap_s390_irq = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ);
> + cap_protvirt = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED);
>
> if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP)
> || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
> @@ -1664,6 +1668,8 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
> (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr);
> switch (icpt_code) {
> case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
> + case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
> + case ICPT_PV_INSTR_NOTIFICATION:
> r = handle_instruction(cpu, run);
I'm still a bit uneasy about going through the same path for both 104
and 108. How does the handler figure out whether it should emulate an
instruction, or just process a notification? Is it guaranteed that a
given instruction is always showing up as either a 104 or a 108, so
that the handler can check the pv state?
[Even if that works, it still feels a bit unclean to me.]
> break;
> case ICPT_PROGRAM:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-29 9:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:18 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 12:40 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 14:08 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-02 9:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 10:48 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:32 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-04 11:34 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 11:46 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] s390x: protvirt: Add pv state to cpu env Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:22 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06 9:50 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06 9:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-05 17:15 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-12-05 17:34 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-05 17:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06 7:44 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06 8:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06 8:45 ` Janosch Frank
2019-12-06 9:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-12-06 9:30 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:15 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 10:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:21 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 11:58 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 12:44 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 11:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-04 12:16 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-05 17:44 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 9:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 11:04 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-29 11:08 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191205181532.46bee55c.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).