qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
To: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: qom device lifecycle interaction with hotplug/hotunplug ?
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:14:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218151443.gwh647paandzoboz@jenstp.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54dc79b4-d033-7990-2f8d-e3787a2803d8@greensocs.com>

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Damien Hedde wrote:
>On 12/4/19 7:51 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:21:25PM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 11:35:37AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 10:18:24AM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:40:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>>>>> +jfreimann, +mst
>And if migration fails this same device is plugged back using
>failover_replug_primary():
>> static bool failover_replug_primary(VirtIONet *n, Error **errp)
>> {
>>     [...]
>>     qdev_set_parent_bus(n->primary_dev, n->primary_bus);
>>     [...]
>>     hotplug_ctrl = qdev_get_hotplug_handler(n->primary_dev);
>>     if (hotplug_ctrl) {
>>         hotplug_handler_pre_plug(hotplug_ctrl, n->primary_dev, &err);
>>         if (err) {
>>             goto out;
>>         }
>>         hotplug_handler_plug(hotplug_ctrl, n->primary_dev, errp);
>>     }
>>     [...]
>> }
>
>My concern is about the qdev_set_parent_bus() call above (because I
>touch this function in my series) and don't want to have side effects there.
>
>I looked at the code and thought the partial unplug has the effect of
>cutting off the unplug procedure just before doing the qdev real unplug.
>In pcie_unplug_device() we return before doing the object_unparent():
>> static void pcie_unplug_device(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev, ...
>>  {
>>      [...]
>>      if (dev->partially_hotplugged) {
>>          dev->qdev.pending_deleted_event = false;
>>          return;
>>      }
>>      hotplug_handler_unplug(hotplug_ctrl, DEVICE(dev), &error_abort);
>>      object_unparent(OBJECT(dev));
>>  }
>
>From my understanding, object_unparent() is the only way to really
>unplug a device from a bus regarding qdev (and it also unrealizes the
>device). So I have the feeling that qdev_set_parent_bus() here is a
>no-op (because primary_dev is already on primary_bus).

I tested this now and it really is a no-op. It was required in a
earlier version of the patches and I missed to remove it when I
reworked the re-plug functionality.

I will send a patch to remove it.

regards
Jens



  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-18 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-28 16:00 qom device lifecycle interaction with hotplug/hotunplug ? Peter Maydell
2019-11-28 16:33 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-11-29 12:40   ` Igor Mammedov
2019-11-29 19:53     ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-11-28 17:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-11-28 17:57   ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-29 12:26     ` Igor Mammedov
2019-11-29 12:45       ` Peter Maydell
2019-11-29 13:05         ` Damien Hedde
2019-11-29 14:23           ` Igor Mammedov
2019-11-29 20:05         ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-11-30 11:10           ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-03 21:40             ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-12-04  9:18               ` Jens Freimann
2019-12-04 14:35                 ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-12-04 16:21                   ` Jens Freimann
2019-12-04 18:51                     ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-12-11 12:52                       ` Damien Hedde
2019-12-18 15:14                         ` Jens Freimann [this message]
2019-12-11 16:01                       ` Igor Mammedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191218151443.gwh647paandzoboz@jenstp.localdomain \
    --to=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=damien.hedde@greensocs.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).