From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm/virt/acpi: remove _ADR from devices identified by _HID
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 07:53:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200105074308-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200105072504-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 07:34:01AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 02:47:59PM +0800, Heyi Guo wrote:
> > According to ACPI spec, _ADR should be used for device which is on a
> > bus that has a standard enumeration algorithm. It does not make sense
> > to have a _ADR object for devices which already have _HID and will be
> > enumerated by OSPM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
>
> Are you sure? I would think this depends on the ID and the device
> really. E.g. PCI devices all are expected to have _ADR and some of them
> have a _HID.
To clarify I am not commenting on patches.
The spec says this:
6.1.5 _HID (Hardware ID)
This object is used to supply OSPM with the device’s PNP ID or ACPI ID. 1
When describing a platform, use of any _HID objects is optional. However, a _HID object must be
used to describe any device that will be enumerated by OSPM. OSPM only enumerates a device
when no bus enumerator can detect the device ID. For example, devices on an ISA bus are
enumerated by OSPM. Use the _ADR object to describe devices enumerated by bus enumerators
other than OSPM.
Note: "detect the device ID" not "enumerate the device" which I think
means there's a driver matching this vendor/device ID.
So it seems fine to have _ADR so device is enumerated, and still have
_HID e.g. so ACPI driver can be loaded as fallback if there's
no bus driver.
Note I am not saying the patch itself is not correct.
Maybe these devices are not on any standard bus and that
is why they should not have _ADR? I have not looked.
I am just saying that spec does not seem to imply _HID and _ADR
can't coexist.
> CC Corey who added a device with both HID and ADR to x86 recenly.
>
> Apropos Corey, why was HID APP0005 chosen?
>
> > ---
> > Cc: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > ---
> > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 8 --------
> > tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT | Bin 18449 -> 18426 bytes
> > tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.memhp | Bin 19786 -> 19763 bytes
> > tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.numamem | Bin 18449 -> 18426 bytes
> > 4 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > index 9f4c7d1889..be752c0ad8 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -78,11 +78,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_uart(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *uart_memmap,
> > AML_EXCLUSIVE, &uart_irq, 1));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> >
> > - /* The _ADR entry is used to link this device to the UART described
> > - * in the SPCR table, i.e. SPCR.base_address.address == _ADR.
> > - */
> > - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(uart_memmap->base)));
> > -
> > aml_append(scope, dev);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -170,7 +165,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_pci(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *memmap,
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CID", aml_string("PNP0A03")));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_SEG", aml_int(0)));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(0)));
> > - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("PCI0")));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR", aml_unicode("PCIe 0 Device")));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CCA", aml_int(1)));
> > @@ -334,7 +328,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_gpio(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry *gpio_memmap,
> > {
> > Aml *dev = aml_device("GPO0");
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ARMH0061")));
> > - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
> >
> > Aml *crs = aml_resource_template();
> > @@ -364,7 +357,6 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)
> > {
> > Aml *dev = aml_device(ACPI_POWER_BUTTON_DEVICE);
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("PNP0C0C")));
> > - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
> > aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
> > aml_append(scope, dev);
> > }
> > diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT b/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT
>
>
> Please do not include binary changes in acpi patches.
>
> See comment at the top of tests/bios-tables-test.c for documentation
> on how to update these.
>
> --
> MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-05 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-19 6:47 [PATCH 0/2] Some cleanup in arm/virt/acpi Heyi Guo
2019-12-19 6:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm/virt/acpi: remove meaningless sub device "PR0" from PCI0 Heyi Guo
2020-01-13 12:37 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-16 12:36 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-21 3:48 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-21 6:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-22 5:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-22 6:38 ` Guoheyi
2019-12-19 6:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm/virt/acpi: remove _ADR from devices identified by _HID Heyi Guo
2020-01-05 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-05 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-01-06 2:10 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-13 8:46 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-16 11:56 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-16 13:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-17 1:54 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-05 22:54 ` Corey Minyard
2020-01-06 9:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-06 13:07 ` Corey Minyard
2020-01-06 15:51 ` Peter Maydell
2020-01-15 2:03 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-15 6:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-15 9:25 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-15 10:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-15 10:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-01-16 12:24 ` Peter Maydell
2020-01-17 2:08 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-13 12:08 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-01-13 13:57 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-13 15:26 ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-15 1:25 ` Guoheyi
2020-01-15 12:08 ` Igor Mammedov
2019-12-19 12:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Some cleanup in arm/virt/acpi Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200105074308-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=guoheyi@huawei.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).