From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044B2C00523 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 01:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C956C215A4 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 01:27:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C956C215A4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioHAy-0006dN-Uq for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 20:27:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioHAO-0006D5-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 20:26:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioHAN-0007Tn-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 20:26:48 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:60325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioHAN-00078k-GO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 20:26:47 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2020 17:26:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,400,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="222123682" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2020 17:26:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:26:40 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy Message-ID: <20200106012640.GA15834@richard> References: <20191025232000.25857-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20191216023539.GB21865@richard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191216023539.GB21865@richard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.55.52.43 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Wei Yang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:35:39AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >Would this one be picked up this time? Happy new year to all. Can I ask the plan for this patch set? > >On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >>We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable >>both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure. >> >>Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption. >>Patch 2 does the main job. >> >>BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send another >>patch set. >> >>Wei Yang (2): >> migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet >> migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy >> >> migration/ram.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >>-- >>2.17.1 > >-- >Wei Yang >Help you, Help me -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me