From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2662CC2D0DB for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E842E2071E for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="e5eg5ivK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E842E2071E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iv44v-0003S9-2b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:53:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iv44E-00030E-TA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:52:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iv44D-0002k4-RK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:52:30 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:60448 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iv44D-0002js-Np for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:52:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1579891949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r0WTI5/39I+bxXRLmiBJUifXso7TTdvpocRQoAmwHvI=; b=e5eg5ivK88aApN1sFvqhemORzlh9AjgNfI3i+wKJ34RDdsuwQSkgj06AI1F6Xg2xa/eG5t H2UnaR3MU4I1cxBXz+S/p0eC5YyTFA1dBteIrAjSzUz3cBszgxWuQ6+v2/uznw0Qzd8NZP JT+fAj6WJeyf+ujbK+/UoINQ7e/gfJ0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-189-FCIV6S1eOPCcJhhqqyu_QA-1; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:52:24 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3950F1137840; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from work-vm (ovpn-117-253.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.253]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DE4760BEC; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:52:08 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: John Snow Subject: Re: Making QEMU easier for management tools and applications Message-ID: <20200124185208.GB2970@work-vm> References: <878slyej29.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20200123190145.GI657556@redhat.com> <2561a069-ce5f-3c30-b04e-db7cd2fcdc85@redhat.com> <871rrp474i.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20200124102743.GB824327@redhat.com> <20200124143841.GG4732@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> <20200124183036.GD2969@work-vm> <50637c89-1c5d-ef1b-4c8c-f23de732bcbc@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50637c89-1c5d-ef1b-4c8c-f23de732bcbc@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.0 (2019-11-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: FCIV6S1eOPCcJhhqqyu_QA-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , Eduardo Habkost , Cleber Rosa , "Denis V. Lunev" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel , Paolo Bonzini , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , Dominik Csapak Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" * John Snow (jsnow@redhat.com) wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 1/24/20 1:30 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > However, I caution that too many people think that QMP has all the type > > of diagnostic stuff people want - it's just way too hard and beuracrati= c > > to add a simple diagnostic command to QMP, when you just want to add > > something to print some diagnostics out for your corner of qemu. >=20 > I'm not sure I follow, do you mean bureaucratic in contrast to... HMP? I mean, someone who adds a QMP command is expected to be a lot more careful about the long term stability and proper structures etc etc. Where for HMP, if someone wants to add a command that's useful to the diagnostics of their part of QEMU and doesn't break anything else, then fine. Dave > --js -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK