Am Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:35:30 +0100
schrieb Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>:

> Is any of the things done by pc_i440fx_5_0_machine_options and
> pc_i440fx_machine_options a desired, or even breaking, change for the
> current result of pc_xen_hvm_init?

I tried to follow a few of the initialized members:

default_nic_model, perhaps the involved code paths are not called, so the NULL pointer does not matter.

pvh_enabled, does this mean the PVH domU type? If yes, this would be lost when xenfv is locked at v3.1.


Olaf