qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com,
	jasowang@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com,
	fengli@smartx.com, yc-core@yandex-team.ru, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] vhost-user-blk: delay vhost_user_blk_disconnect
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 11:57:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525085741.GA7645@dimastep-nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0dfb37f8728aba26c8d6c117018332a5b7dc9b56.1589989075.git.dimastep@yandex-team.ru>

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:53:13PM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> A socket write during vhost-user communication may trigger a disconnect
> event, calling vhost_user_blk_disconnect() and clearing all the
> vhost_dev structures holding data that vhost-user functions expect to
> remain valid to roll back initialization correctly. Delay the cleanup to
> keep vhost_dev structure valid.
> There are two possible states to handle:
> 1. RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH: skip bh oneshot call and perform disconnect in
> the caller routine.
> 2. RUN_STATE_RUNNING: delay by using bh
> 
> BH changes are based on the similar changes for the vhost-user-net
> device:
>   commit e7c83a885f865128ae3cf1946f8cb538b63cbfba
>   "vhost-user: delay vhost_user_stop"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>

I've reworked the patch based on Raphael's comment and send it for
review. Also i added a TODO comment in the vhost_user_blk_event()
routine. After review i'll send a v4 patch set.

---
 hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
index 9d8c0b3..76838e7 100644
--- a/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
+++ b/hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c
@@ -349,6 +349,19 @@ static void vhost_user_blk_disconnect(DeviceState *dev)
     vhost_dev_cleanup(&s->dev);
 }
 
+static void vhost_user_blk_event(void *opaque, QEMUChrEvent event);
+
+static void vhost_user_blk_chr_closed_bh(void *opaque)
+{
+    DeviceState *dev = opaque;
+    VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
+    VHostUserBlk *s = VHOST_USER_BLK(vdev);
+
+    vhost_user_blk_disconnect(dev);
+    qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chardev, NULL, NULL, vhost_user_blk_event,
+            NULL, opaque, NULL, true);
+}
+
 static void vhost_user_blk_event(void *opaque, QEMUChrEvent event)
 {
     DeviceState *dev = opaque;
@@ -363,7 +376,30 @@ static void vhost_user_blk_event(void *opaque, QEMUChrEvent event)
         }
         break;
     case CHR_EVENT_CLOSED:
-        vhost_user_blk_disconnect(dev);
+        /*
+         * A close event may happen during a read/write, but vhost
+         * code assumes the vhost_dev remains setup, so delay the
+         * stop & clear. There are two possible paths to hit this
+         * disconnect event:
+         * 1. When VM is in the RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH state. The
+         * vhost_user_blk_device_realize() is a caller.
+         * 2. In tha main loop phase after VM start.
+         *
+         * For p2 the disconnect event will be delayed. We can't
+         * do the same for p1, because we are not running the loop
+         * at this moment. So just skip this step and perform
+         * disconnect in the caller function.
+         *
+         * TODO: maybe it is a good idea to make the same fix
+         * for other vhost-user devices.
+         */
+        if (runstate_is_running()) {
+            AioContext *ctx = qemu_get_current_aio_context();
+
+            qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chardev, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+                    NULL, NULL, false);
+            aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(ctx, vhost_user_blk_chr_closed_bh, opaque);
+        }
         break;
     case CHR_EVENT_BREAK:
     case CHR_EVENT_MUX_IN:
-- 
2.7.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-25  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-20 15:53 [PATCH v3 0/2] vhost-user reconnect issues during vhost initialization Dima Stepanov
2020-05-20 15:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] char-socket: return -1 in case of disconnect during tcp_chr_write Dima Stepanov
2020-05-20 15:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] vhost-user-blk: delay vhost_user_blk_disconnect Dima Stepanov
2020-05-25  3:31   ` Jason Wang
2020-05-25  8:27     ` Dima Stepanov
2020-05-25  4:00   ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-05-25  8:54     ` Dima Stepanov
2020-05-25  8:57   ` Dima Stepanov [this message]
2020-05-25 20:56     ` Raphael Norwitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200525085741.GA7645@dimastep-nix \
    --to=dimastep@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengli@smartx.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
    --cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).