qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	vit9696 <vit9696@protonmail.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386/acpi: fix inconsistent QEMU/OVMF device paths
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:30:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731113044.12b5f6ef@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200730155755.188845-1-mst@redhat.com>

On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:58:38 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> macOS uses ACPI UIDs to build the DevicePath for NVRAM boot options,
> while OVMF firmware gets them via an internal channel through QEMU.
> Due to a bug in QEMU ACPI currently UEFI firmware and ACPI have
> different values, and this makes the underlying operating system
> unable to report its boot option.
> 
> The particular node in question is the primary PciRoot (PCI0 in ACPI),
> which for some reason gets assigned 1 in ACPI UID and 0 in the
> DevicePath. This is due to the _UID assigned to it by build_dsdt in
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c Which does not correspond to the primary PCI
> identifier given by pcibus_num in hw/pci/pci.c
> 
> Reference with the device paths, OVMF startup logs, and ACPI table
> dumps (SysReport):
> https://github.com/acidanthera/bugtracker/issues/1050
> 
> In UEFI v2.8, section "10.4.2 Rules with ACPI _HID and _UID" ends with
> the paragraph,
> 
>     Root PCI bridges will use the plug and play ID of PNP0A03, This will
>     be stored in the ACPI Device Path _HID field, or in the Expanded
>     ACPI Device Path _CID field to match the ACPI name space. The _UID
>     in the ACPI Device Path structure must match the _UID in the ACPI
>     name space.
> 
> (See especially the last sentence.)
> 
> Considering *extra* root bridges / root buses (with bus number > 0),
> QEMU's ACPI generator actually does the right thing; since QEMU commit
> c96d9286a6d7 ("i386/acpi-build: more traditional _UID and _HID for PXB
> root buses", 2015-06-11).
> 
> However, the _UID values for root bridge zero (on both i440fx and q35)
> have always been "wrong" (from UEFI perspective), going back in QEMU to
> commit 74523b850189 ("i386: add ACPI table files from seabios",
> 2013-10-14).
> 
> Even in SeaBIOS, these _UID values have always been 1; see commit
> a4d357638c57 ("Port rombios32 code from bochs-bios.", 2008-03-08) for
> i440fx, and commit ecbe3fd61511 ("seabios: q35: add dsdt", 2012-12-01)
> for q35.
> 
> Suggested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: vit9696 <vit9696@protonmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index b7bcbbbb2a..7a5a8b3521 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
>          dev = aml_device("PCI0");
>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
> -        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(1)));
> +        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
>          aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
>          aml_append(dsdt, sb_scope);
>  
> @@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A08")));
>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A03")));
>          aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(0)));
> -        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(1)));
> +        aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
>          aml_append(dev, build_q35_osc_method());
>          aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
>          aml_append(dsdt, sb_scope);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-31  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-30 15:58 [PATCH 1/2] i386/acpi: fix inconsistent QEMU/OVMF device paths Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-30 15:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm/acpi: fix an out of spec _UID for PCI root Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-30 16:12   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-30 19:35   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-07-30 20:33   ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-31  9:31   ` Igor Mammedov
2020-07-30 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] i386/acpi: fix inconsistent QEMU/OVMF device paths Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-30 19:35   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-31  2:55     ` vit9696 via
2020-07-30 19:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-07-31  9:30 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2021-02-27 19:41 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-02-28  9:11   ` vit9696
2021-02-28 10:43     ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-02-28 20:45       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
     [not found]       ` <x3i3TiibtrC1qTDQUKxuOA_9qvmInzVwv6RrvzzSCSj-S21gLypbbZgEbYvJSGMxC1r8RaDrnHGgRbDI7vfpA_XuDINdZej9yKCW3_Sc4YM=@protonmail.com>
2021-02-28 21:37         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-28 20:43   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01  7:12     ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-03-01  7:20       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01  7:45         ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-03-01 14:20           ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-01 14:27             ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-03-01 20:16               ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-01 15:31           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 13:28     ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-01 16:14       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-01 16:28         ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-03-01 19:08           ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-01 20:06             ` vit9696
2021-03-02  8:40             ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-04-18  9:06 zhangying (AZ) via
2023-04-19  2:48 zhangying (AZ) via
2023-04-20 14:54 ` Igor Mammedov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200731113044.12b5f6ef@redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=vit9696@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).