qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@xilinx.com>
To: Joe Komlodi <joe.komlodi@xilinx.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, alistair@alistair23.me, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/block/m25p80: Fix Numonyx dummy cycle register behavior
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:50:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020135010.jwkkr4or6zs5fcm7@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1601425716-204629-2-git-send-email-komlodi@xilinx.com>

Hi Joe,

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 05:28:35PM -0700, Joe Komlodi wrote:
> Numonyx chips determine the number of cycles to wait based on bits 7:4 in the
> volatile configuration register.
> 
> However, if these bits are 0x0 or 0xF, the number of dummy cycles to wait is
> 10 on a QIOR or QIOR4 command, or 8 on any other currently supported
> fast read command. [1]
> 
> [1] http://www.micron.com/-/media/client/global/documents/products/
> data-sheet/nor-flash/serial-nor/n25q/n25q_512mb_1_8v_65nm.pdf
> 
> Page 22 note 2, and page 30 notes 5 and 10.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Komlodi <komlodi@xilinx.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/m25p80.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/block/m25p80.c b/hw/block/m25p80.c
> index 483925f..43830c9 100644
> --- a/hw/block/m25p80.c
> +++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c
> @@ -820,6 +820,26 @@ static void reset_memory(Flash *s)
>      trace_m25p80_reset_done(s);
>  }
>  
> +static uint8_t numonyx_fast_read_num_dummies(Flash *s)

Should we rename the function to something like
'numonyx_extract_cfg_num_dummies' (since it is not only used inside
'decode_fast_read_cmd')?

> +{
> +    uint8_t cycle_count;
> +    uint8_t num_dummies;
> +    assert(get_man(s) == MAN_NUMONYX);
> +
> +    cycle_count = extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 4, 4);
> +    if (cycle_count == 0x0 || cycle_count == 0x0F) {
> +        if (s->cmd_in_progress == QIOR || s->cmd_in_progress == QIOR4) {

QOR and QOR4 also has 10 dummy cycles on default so we will have to check for
those aswell, perhaps something similar like below migth work:  

uint8_t n_dummies = extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 4, 4);

if (!n_dummies || n_dummies == 0xF) {
    switch(s->cmd_in_progress){
    case QOR:
    case QOR4
    case QIOR:
    case QIOR4:
        n_dummies = 10;
        break;
    default:
        n_dummies = 8;
        break;
    }
}

return n_dummies;

Best regards,
Francisco Iglesias

> +            num_dummies = 10;
> +        } else {
> +            num_dummies = 8;
> +        }
> +    } else {
> +        num_dummies = cycle_count;
> +    }
> +
> +    return num_dummies;
> +}
> +
>  static void decode_fast_read_cmd(Flash *s)
>  {
>      s->needed_bytes = get_addr_length(s);
> @@ -829,7 +849,7 @@ static void decode_fast_read_cmd(Flash *s)
>          s->needed_bytes += 8;
>          break;
>      case MAN_NUMONYX:
> -        s->needed_bytes += extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 4, 4);
> +        s->needed_bytes += numonyx_fast_read_num_dummies(s);
>          break;
>      case MAN_MACRONIX:
>          if (extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 6, 2) == 1) {
> @@ -868,7 +888,7 @@ static void decode_dio_read_cmd(Flash *s)
>                                      );
>          break;
>      case MAN_NUMONYX:
> -        s->needed_bytes += extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 4, 4);
> +        s->needed_bytes += numonyx_fast_read_num_dummies(s);
>          break;
>      case MAN_MACRONIX:
>          switch (extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 6, 2)) {
> @@ -908,7 +928,7 @@ static void decode_qio_read_cmd(Flash *s)
>                                      );
>          break;
>      case MAN_NUMONYX:
> -        s->needed_bytes += extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 4, 4);
> +        s->needed_bytes += numonyx_fast_read_num_dummies(s);
>          break;
>      case MAN_MACRONIX:
>          switch (extract32(s->volatile_cfg, 6, 2)) {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-20 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30  0:28 [PATCH 0/2] hw/block/m25p80: Fix Numonyx flash dummy cycle register behavior Joe Komlodi
2020-09-30  0:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw/block/m25p80: Fix Numonyx " Joe Komlodi
2020-10-20 13:50   ` Francisco Iglesias [this message]
2020-10-27 23:00     ` Joe Komlodi
2020-09-30  0:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw/block/m25p80: Fix nonvolatile-cfg property default value Joe Komlodi
2020-09-30 14:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] hw/block/m25p80: Fix Numonyx flash dummy cycle register behavior no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201020135010.jwkkr4or6zs5fcm7@debian \
    --to=francisco.iglesias@xilinx.com \
    --cc=alistair@alistair23.me \
    --cc=joe.komlodi@xilinx.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).