From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3653C64E7A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A79320770 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="F2rhxDxG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A79320770 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58858 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk4CO-0002TU-RN for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:52:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk4BS-0001zZ-Ve for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:51:03 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:28153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kk4BQ-0005as-A2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:51:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606823458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ay9ItD6Kzh25y4pze0iPQOTVfknUuyVxyktssHh8Ios=; b=F2rhxDxGoGZVg/V+i793HglBmDFm137/eFHDSXSeoisZr2Ln30yrtEv+7mIpz0BzjOWnzs qKJPFeQLG5VCFpe867JlwBe8SIyPcJpJkQSV67OdnqEk3DnC0ZD+IdXPhno0ap/l2t4BC+ fegTSX2f+62n45kcmzMqOIP24Yfg2/s= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-64-CgMN2nTtMV2UUlP0nhldsA-1; Tue, 01 Dec 2020 06:50:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: CgMN2nTtMV2UUlP0nhldsA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 905BF817B91; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from work-vm (ovpn-115-1.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.1]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB4F6086F; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 11:50:47 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] memattrs: add debug attribute Message-ID: <20201201115047.GA15055@work-vm> References: <2ba88b512ec667eff66b2ece2177330a28e657c0.1605316268.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=dgilbert@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.496, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Lendacky , Ashish Kalra , Brijesh Singh , Eduardo Habkost , kvm-devel , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Marcelo Tosatti , Markus Armbruster , QEMU Developers , ssg.sos.patches@amd.com, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" * Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 19:28, Ashish Kalra wrote: > > > > From: Brijesh Singh > > > > From: Brijesh Singh > > > > Extend the MemTxAttrs to include a 'debug' flag. The flag can be used as > > general indicator that operation was triggered by the debugger. > > > > A subsequent patch will set the debug=1 when issuing a memory access > > from the gdbstub or HMP commands. This is a prerequisite to support > > debugging an encrypted guest. When a request with debug=1 is seen, the > > encryption APIs will be used to access the guest memory. > > So, what counts as "debug" here, and why are debug requests > special? If "debug=1" means "can actually get at the guest memory", > why wouldn't every device model want to use it? SEV has a flag that the guest-owner can set on a VM to enable debug; it's rare for it to be enabled; so it's not suitable for use by normal devices. It's only there for debug if the guest owner allows you to. Dave > thanks > -- PMM > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK