Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] update-linux-headers: Include const.h

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 12:50:34PM -0500, Eric Farman wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/7/21 12:05 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 16:52, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On 1/6/21 2:03 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > Could I ask why the const.h is installed into include/standard-headers/linux
> > > > rather than linux-headers/linux?  When I was working on my version I failed to
> > > > figure out the difference.
> > > 
> > > Considering the main difference is whether the header file is copied
> > > directly or edited with a bunch of substitutions, and const.h doesn't
> > > get modified by those substitutions, I suppose it could go in
> > > linux-headers itself.
> > 
> > No, it can't, because linux-headers/ only goes on the include
> > path when on a Linux host and on a CPU architecture with KVM support,
> > whereas include/standard-headers/ headers are available and
> > used on all host OSes/architectures.
> > 
> > Because include/standard-headers/linux/ethtool.h will end up
> > with a line
> >   #include "standard-headers/linux/const.h"
> > we need to provide a const.h in that location so that the #include
> > pulls in the file correctly.
> 
> Ah, today I learned.  Thanks, Peter.

Yeah.  Peter taught me the rules on IRC after I posted the email, and I didn't
update later.  So I guess my r-b stands. :) Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu