From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HK_RANDOM_FROM, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F67C433DB for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F72C20E65 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:20:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F72C20E65 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bu.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:36002 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l47PJ-0001yA-Ob for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:20:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l47GN-0005v7-3c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:11:00 -0500 Received: from relay68.bu.edu ([128.197.228.73]:55595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l47GL-00083g-5d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:10:58 -0500 X-Envelope-From: alxndr@bu.edu X-BU-AUTH: mozz.bu.edu [128.197.127.33] Received: from BU-AUTH (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay68.bu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id 10PJ9t4J020222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:09:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:09:55 -0500 From: Alexander Bulekov To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PULL 0/7] 2021-01-20 fuzzing patches Message-ID: <20210125190955.crxoyqbezzvdwois@mozz.bu.edu> References: <20210120174456.275312-1-alxndr@bu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=128.197.228.73; envelope-from=alxndr@bu.edu; helo=relay68.bu.edu X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 210122 1506, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 17:45, Alexander Bulekov wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > The following changes since commit 48202c712412c803ddb56365c7bca322aa4e7506: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/pmaydell/tags/pull-target-arm-20210119-1' into staging (2021-01-19 15:47:23 +0000) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://gitlab.com/a1xndr/qemu.git tags/pull-request-2021-01-20 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to fae446ae7b6f746377186b3e19fd3f732a8b4325: > > > > fuzz: add virtio-9p configurations for fuzzing (2021-01-20 12:30:26 -0500) > > Hi; some of these commits seem to be missing Reviewed-by: tags; > for instance "ignore address_space_map is_write flag" got a > Reviewed-by from Darren Kenny, and that tag is visible in the > (second) copy of the email for the pullreq that you sent to the > list, but it isn't in the commit that's at the tag you name above, > and it's the commits in the git repo that end up in master, not > the patch emails sent to the list. > > Also, are you in a position to get your GPG key signed by > anybody else? I appreciate that that's pretty tricky right > now given Covid, but if you have the opportunity at some point > that would be useful. > Hi Peter, Thank you for these pointers. I resent a PR with fixed tags. I should also now have a few signatures on my key. I realized that Paolo asked me to send the PR to him, so I fixed that in my RESEND. Thanks again -Alex > thanks > -- PMM