From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] i386: Add missing "vmx-ept-wb" feature name
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:54:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201225404.3941395-2-ehabkost@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201225404.3941395-1-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Not having a feature name in feature_word_info breaks error
reporting and query-cpu-model-expansion. Add the missing feature
name to feature_word_info[FEAT_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAPS].feat_names[14].
Fixes: 0723cc8a5558 ("target/i386: add VMX features to named CPU models")
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index ae89024d366..2bf3ab78056 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@ static FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] = {
"vmx-ept-execonly", NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, "vmx-page-walk-4", "vmx-page-walk-5",
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
- NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ NULL, NULL, "vmx-ept-wb", NULL,
"vmx-ept-2mb", "vmx-ept-1gb", NULL, NULL,
"vmx-invept", "vmx-eptad", "vmx-ept-advanced-exitinfo", NULL,
NULL, "vmx-invept-single-context", "vmx-invept-all-context", NULL,
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 22:54 [PATCH 0/3] i386: Ensure feature names are always defined Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-01 22:54 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2021-02-01 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] i386: Add missing "vmx-ept-wb" feature name Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-01 23:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-01 23:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 0:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-02 7:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 15:25 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-01 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386: Move asserts to separate x86_cpudef_validate() function Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-02 16:02 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-01 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] i386: Sanity check CPU model feature sets Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210201225404.3941395-2-ehabkost@redhat.com \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).