qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/4] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader
Date: Tue,  9 Mar 2021 10:21:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210309102157.365356-3-david.edmondson@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309102157.365356-1-david.edmondson@oracle.com>

Given that the block size is read from the header of the VDI file, a
wide variety of sizes might be seen. Rather than re-using a block
sized memory region when writing the VDI header, allocate an
appropriately sized buffer.

Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
---
 block/vdi.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/vdi.c b/block/vdi.c
index 2a6dc26124..548f8a057b 100644
--- a/block/vdi.c
+++ b/block/vdi.c
@@ -696,18 +696,20 @@ nonallocating_write:
 
     if (block) {
         /* One or more new blocks were allocated. */
-        VdiHeader *header = (VdiHeader *) block;
+        VdiHeader *header;
         uint8_t *base;
         uint64_t offset;
         uint32_t n_sectors;
 
+        g_free(block);
+        header = g_malloc(sizeof(*header));
+
         logout("now writing modified header\n");
         assert(VDI_IS_ALLOCATED(bmap_first));
         *header = s->header;
         vdi_header_to_le(header);
-        ret = bdrv_pwrite(bs->file, 0, block, sizeof(VdiHeader));
-        g_free(block);
-        block = NULL;
+        ret = bdrv_pwrite(bs->file, 0, header, sizeof(*header));
+        g_free(header);
 
         if (ret < 0) {
             return ret;
-- 
2.30.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-09 10:21 [RFC PATCH 0/4] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] block/vdi: When writing new bmap entry fails, don't leak the buffer David Edmondson
2021-03-09 11:09   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-09 11:58     ` David Edmondson
2021-03-09 12:06       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-09 13:07         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 10:21 ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:49   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 11:11   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-09 10:21 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] coroutine/rwlock: Wake writers in preference to readers David Edmondson
2021-03-09 10:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 11:06   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-09 11:57     ` David Edmondson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210309102157.365356-3-david.edmondson@oracle.com \
    --to=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).