From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] virtio: Improve boot time of virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:51:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325215134.749779f5@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFzLrn4SGjaIzC6p@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3572 bytes --]
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:43:10 +0000
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:05:16PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Now that virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci map 1 virtqueue per vCPU,
> > > a serious slow down may be observed on setups with a big enough number
> > > of vCPUs.
> > >
> > > Exemple with a pseries guest on a bi-POWER9 socket system (128 HW threads):
> > >
> > > 1 0m20.922s 0m21.346s
> > > 2 0m21.230s 0m20.350s
> > > 4 0m21.761s 0m20.997s
> > > 8 0m22.770s 0m20.051s
> > > 16 0m22.038s 0m19.994s
> > > 32 0m22.928s 0m20.803s
> > > 64 0m26.583s 0m22.953s
> > > 128 0m41.273s 0m32.333s
> > > 256 2m4.727s 1m16.924s
> > > 384 6m5.563s 3m26.186s
> > >
> > > Both perf and gprof indicate that QEMU is hogging CPUs when setting up
> > > the ioeventfds:
> > >
> > > 67.88% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] power_pmu_enable
> > > 9.47% qemu-kvm [kernel.kallsyms] [k] smp_call_function_single
> > > 8.64% qemu-kvm [kernel.kallsyms] [k] power_pmu_enable
> > > =>2.79% qemu-kvm qemu-kvm [.] memory_region_ioeventfd_before
> > > =>2.12% qemu-kvm qemu-kvm [.] address_space_update_ioeventfds
> > > 0.56% kworker/8:0-mm [kernel.kallsyms] [k] smp_call_function_single
> > >
> > > address_space_update_ioeventfds() is called when committing an MR
> > > transaction, i.e. for each ioeventfd with the current code base,
> > > and it internally loops on all ioventfds:
> > >
> > > static void address_space_update_ioeventfds(AddressSpace *as)
> > > {
> > > [...]
> > > FOR_EACH_FLAT_RANGE(fr, view) {
> > > for (i = 0; i < fr->mr->ioeventfd_nb; ++i) {
> > >
> > > This means that the setup of ioeventfds for these devices has
> > > quadratic time complexity.
> > >
> > > This series introduce generic APIs to allow batch creation and deletion
> > > of ioeventfds, and converts virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to use them. This
> > > greatly improves the numbers:
> > >
> > > 1 0m21.271s 0m22.076s
> > > 2 0m20.912s 0m19.716s
> > > 4 0m20.508s 0m19.310s
> > > 8 0m21.374s 0m20.273s
> > > 16 0m21.559s 0m21.374s
> > > 32 0m22.532s 0m21.271s
> > > 64 0m26.550s 0m22.007s
> > > 128 0m29.115s 0m27.446s
> > > 256 0m44.752s 0m41.004s
> > > 384 1m2.884s 0m58.023s
> > >
> > > The series deliberately spans over multiple subsystems for easier
> > > review and experimenting. It also does some preliminary fixes on
> > > the way. It is thus posted as an RFC for now, but if the general
> > > idea is acceptable, I guess a non-RFC could be posted and maybe
> > > extend the feature to some other devices that might suffer from
> > > similar scaling issues, e.g. vhost-scsi-pci, vhost-user-scsi-pci
> > > and vhost-user-blk-pci, even if I haven't checked.
> > >
> > > This should fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927108
> > > which reported the issue for virtio-scsi-pci.
> >
> >
> > Series looks ok from a quick look ...
> >
> > this is a regression isn't it?
> > So I guess we'll need that in 6.0 or revert the # of vqs
> > change for now ...
>
> Commit 9445e1e15e66c19e42bea942ba810db28052cd05 ("virtio-blk-pci:
> default num_queues to -smp N") was already released in QEMU 5.2.0. It is
> not a QEMU 6.0 regression.
>
Oh you're right, I've just checked and QEMU 5.2.0 has the same problem.
> I'll review this series on Monday.
>
Thanks !
> Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-25 15:07 [RFC 0/8] virtio: Improve boot time of virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci Greg Kurz
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 1/8] memory: Allow eventfd add/del without starting a transaction Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-30 7:47 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-30 10:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 2/8] virtio: Introduce virtio_bus_set_host_notifiers() Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 3/8] virtio: Add API to batch set host notifiers Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-30 10:17 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-30 13:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-30 14:17 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-31 14:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-31 16:21 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 4/8] virtio-pci: Batch add/del ioeventfds in a single MR transaction Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-30 10:29 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 5/8] virtio-blk: Fix rollback path in virtio_blk_data_plane_start() Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 6/8] virtio-blk: Use virtio_bus_set_host_notifiers() Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 7/8] virtio-scsi: Set host notifiers and callbacks separately Greg Kurz
2021-03-25 15:07 ` [RFC 8/8] virtio-scsi: Use virtio_bus_set_host_notifiers() Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-25 17:05 ` [RFC 0/8] virtio: Improve boot time of virtio-scsi-pci and virtio-blk-pci Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-25 17:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-25 20:51 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2021-03-25 18:05 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-29 17:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-30 13:15 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210325215134.749779f5@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).