qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-6.0? 0/3] job: Add job_wait_unpaused() for block-job-complete
Date: Thu,  8 Apr 2021 18:20:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210408162039.242670-1-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

See patch 1 for a detailed explanation of the problem.

The gist is: Draining a READY job makes it transition to STANDBY, and
jobs on STANDBY cannot be completed.  Ending the drained section will
schedule the job (so it is then resumed), but not wait until it is
actually running again.

Therefore, it can happen that issuing block-job-complete fails when you
issue it right after some draining operation.

I tried to come up with an iotest reproducer, but in the end I only got
something that reproduced the issue like 2/10 times, and it required
heavy I/O, so it is nothing I would like to have as part of the iotests.
Instead, I opted for a unit test, which allows me to cheat a bit
(specifically, locking the job IO thread before ending the drained
section).


Max Reitz (3):
  job: Add job_wait_unpaused() for block-job-complete
  test-blockjob: Test job_wait_unpaused()
  iotests/041: block-job-complete on user-paused job

 include/qemu/job.h         |  15 ++++
 blockdev.c                 |   3 +
 job.c                      |  42 +++++++++++
 tests/unit/test-blockjob.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/qemu-iotests/041     |  13 +++-
 5 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.29.2



             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-08 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 16:20 Max Reitz [this message]
2021-04-08 16:20 ` [PATCH for-6.0? 1/3] job: Add job_wait_unpaused() for block-job-complete Max Reitz
2021-04-08 16:55   ` John Snow
2021-04-09  9:31     ` Max Reitz
2021-04-09 10:17       ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-09  9:44     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-09  9:57       ` Max Reitz
2021-04-09 16:54         ` John Snow
2021-04-08 16:58   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-08 17:04     ` John Snow
2021-04-08 17:26       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-09  9:51         ` Max Reitz
2021-04-09 10:07           ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-09 10:18             ` Max Reitz
2021-04-09  9:38     ` Max Reitz
2021-04-08 16:20 ` [PATCH for-6.0? 2/3] test-blockjob: Test job_wait_unpaused() Max Reitz
2021-04-08 16:20 ` [PATCH for-6.0? 3/3] iotests/041: block-job-complete on user-paused job Max Reitz
2021-04-08 17:09 ` [PATCH for-6.0? 0/3] job: Add job_wait_unpaused() for block-job-complete John Snow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210408162039.242670-1-mreitz@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).