From: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "open list:virtiofs" <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of iovec to GLib's functions
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:13:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210427181333.148176-1-ma.mandourr@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIf2d8HuyPqwqt9C@work-vm>
Replaced the calls to malloc()/calloc() and their respective
calls to free() of iovec structs with GLib's allocation and
deallocation functions and used g_autofree when appropriate.
Replaced the allocation of in_sg_cpy to g_new() instead of a call
to calloc() and a null-checking assertion. Not g_new0()
because the buffer is immediately overwritten using memcpy.
Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
* Removed a wrongful combination of g_autofree and g_steel_pointer().
* Removed some goto paths that IMHO were not so useful any more.
* In v2, I allocated in_sg_cpy through g_new0(). This patch, I use
g_new() because the buffer is memcpy'd into right away so no need
to zero-initialize.
* Moved the declaration of in_sg_cpy to the top of the function
to match QEMU's style guidelines.
tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c | 31 ++++++++++++-------------------
tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 8 +++-----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
index c8bea246ab..7fe2cef1eb 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@ static int send_reply(fuse_req_t req, int error, const void *arg,
int fuse_reply_iov(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *iov, int count)
{
int res;
- struct iovec *padded_iov;
+ g_autofree struct iovec *padded_iov = NULL;
- padded_iov = malloc((count + 1) * sizeof(struct iovec));
+ padded_iov = g_try_new(struct iovec, count + 1);
if (padded_iov == NULL) {
return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
}
@@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ int fuse_reply_iov(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *iov, int count)
count++;
res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, padded_iov, count);
- free(padded_iov);
return res;
}
@@ -568,7 +567,7 @@ static struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(const struct iovec *iov,
struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *fiov;
size_t i;
- fiov = malloc(sizeof(fiov[0]) * count);
+ fiov = g_try_new(struct fuse_ioctl_iovec, count);
if (!fiov) {
return NULL;
}
@@ -586,8 +585,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
size_t out_count)
{
struct fuse_ioctl_out arg;
- struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *in_fiov = NULL;
- struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *out_fiov = NULL;
+ g_autofree struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *in_fiov = NULL;
+ g_autofree struct fuse_ioctl_iovec *out_fiov = NULL;
struct iovec iov[4];
size_t count = 1;
int res;
@@ -603,13 +602,14 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
/* Can't handle non-compat 64bit ioctls on 32bit */
if (sizeof(void *) == 4 && req->ioctl_64bit) {
res = fuse_reply_err(req, EINVAL);
- goto out;
+ return res;
}
if (in_count) {
in_fiov = fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(in_iov, in_count);
if (!in_fiov) {
- goto enomem;
+ res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
+ return res;
}
iov[count].iov_base = (void *)in_fiov;
@@ -619,7 +619,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
if (out_count) {
out_fiov = fuse_ioctl_iovec_copy(out_iov, out_count);
if (!out_fiov) {
- goto enomem;
+ res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
+ return res;
}
iov[count].iov_base = (void *)out_fiov;
@@ -628,15 +629,8 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_retry(fuse_req_t req, const struct iovec *in_iov,
}
res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, iov, count);
-out:
- free(in_fiov);
- free(out_fiov);
return res;
-
-enomem:
- res = fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
- goto out;
}
int fuse_reply_ioctl(fuse_req_t req, int result, const void *buf, size_t size)
@@ -663,11 +657,11 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl(fuse_req_t req, int result, const void *buf, size_t size)
int fuse_reply_ioctl_iov(fuse_req_t req, int result, const struct iovec *iov,
int count)
{
- struct iovec *padded_iov;
+ g_autofree struct iovec *padded_iov = NULL;
struct fuse_ioctl_out arg;
int res;
- padded_iov = malloc((count + 2) * sizeof(struct iovec));
+ padded_iov = g_try_new(struct iovec, count + 2);
if (padded_iov == NULL) {
return fuse_reply_err(req, ENOMEM);
}
@@ -680,7 +674,6 @@ int fuse_reply_ioctl_iov(fuse_req_t req, int result, const struct iovec *iov,
memcpy(&padded_iov[2], iov, count * sizeof(struct iovec));
res = send_reply_iov(req, 0, padded_iov, count + 2);
- free(padded_iov);
return res;
}
diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
index 9e437618fb..9b00687cb0 100644
--- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
+++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
@@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
VuVirtqElement *elem = &req->elem;
int ret = 0;
+ g_autofree struct iovec *in_sg_cpy = NULL;
+
assert(count >= 1);
assert(iov[0].iov_len >= sizeof(struct fuse_out_header));
@@ -347,8 +349,7 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
* Build a copy of the the in_sg iov so we can skip bits in it,
* including changing the offsets
*/
- struct iovec *in_sg_cpy = calloc(sizeof(struct iovec), in_num);
- assert(in_sg_cpy);
+ in_sg_cpy = g_new(struct iovec, in_num);
memcpy(in_sg_cpy, in_sg, sizeof(struct iovec) * in_num);
/* These get updated as we skip */
struct iovec *in_sg_ptr = in_sg_cpy;
@@ -386,7 +387,6 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
ret = errno;
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv failed (%m) len=%zd\n",
__func__, len);
- free(in_sg_cpy);
goto err;
}
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: preadv ret=%d len=%zd\n", __func__,
@@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
if (ret != len) {
fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: ret!=len\n", __func__);
ret = EIO;
- free(in_sg_cpy);
goto err;
}
in_sg_left -= ret;
len -= ret;
} while (in_sg_left);
- free(in_sg_cpy);
/* Need to fix out->len on EOF */
if (len) {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-27 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 15:46 [PATCH v2 0/7] virtiofsd: Changed various allocations to GLib functions Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of fuse_req " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 19:03 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-04-21 0:39 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 9:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] virtiofds: Changed allocations of iovec to GLib's functions Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 10:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 10:53 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 11:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 11:08 ` Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 11:33 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 18:13 ` Mahmoud Mandour [this message]
2021-05-06 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] virtiofsd: " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 18:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] virtiofds: " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-27 18:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-27 10:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of fuse_session " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocation of lo_map_elems " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] virtiofsd: Changed allocations of fv_VuDev & its internals to GLib functions Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c: Changed local allocations " Mahmoud Mandour
2021-04-20 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c: Changed allocations of locals to GLib Mahmoud Mandour
2021-05-06 16:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] virtiofsd: Changed various allocations to GLib functions Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210427181333.148176-1-ma.mandourr@gmail.com \
--to=ma.mandourr@gmail.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).