From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D4FC4338F for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E363060E9B for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 03:06:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E363060E9B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=fujitsu.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9Iqp-0003ao-VO for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:06:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9Ipw-0002fK-43; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:05:24 -0400 Received: from esa12.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com ([139.138.37.100]:64470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9Ipt-000685-Q3; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:05:23 -0400 IronPort-SDR: z9r+OjT+ftd1roXXRG+QAAyTTGBgZ34bdtD9B/jbEsTN0db9/2aRbIKsa4KRaUh334Ps7hcUDm CsVnzPnjtVGu+SO+6auot/QVBz59r7QRd+ULwe9N0p8EojQ5LNP4OoQPSPqnDQI//VEdRN38UG 7e2l3Tfwfes3ET3QatyLsl1BoPgmEI+8OZ+azEmO1uAdiUDQVMlUORN9dJ200npUquROuEaG9A R6oGLd3f9NSUznfpr67c2YbgvfRCHdTEmGfk36iyHUy7BsleQshU0ltShHcf4SDZxDy1rkKJC+ c1EwqM3ol+HSrSzwCobRpY3C X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10060"; a="18299087" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,280,1620658800"; d="scan'208";a="18299087" Received: from unknown (HELO yto-r2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com) ([218.44.52.218]) by esa12.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2021 12:05:16 +0900 Received: from yto-m2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (yto-nat-yto-m2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com [192.168.83.65]) by yto-r2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D89F6ABE7; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:05:15 +0900 (JST) Received: from yto-om2.fujitsu.com (yto-om2.o.css.fujitsu.com [10.128.89.163]) by yto-m2.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2652E6463; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:05:14 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (n3235113.np.ts.nmh.cs.fujitsu.co.jp [10.123.235.113]) by yto-om2.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4E4400E5C03; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:05:14 +0900 (JST) From: Shuuichirou Ishii To: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Fujitsu A64FX processor Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:40:20 +0900 Message-Id: <20210730014023.228117-1-ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 Received-SPF: neutral client-ip=139.138.37.100; envelope-from=ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com; helo=esa12.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com X-Spam_score_int: -33 X-Spam_score: -3.4 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This is the v2 patch series. v2: No features have been added or removed from the v1 patch series. Removal of unused definitions that were added in excess, and consolidation of patches for the purpose of functional consistency. For patch 1, ARM_FEATURE_A64FX is not used in the v1 patch series, so it was deleted this time, and will be added again when it is used. For patch 2, since the a64fx_cp_reginfo structure is not used in the v1 patch series, I deleted the empty definition and added the TODO in the aarch64_a64fx_initfn function. Also fixed the appearance, and cleaned up and removed some things for patch consistency. For patch 3, a64fx was added to docs/system/arm/virt.rst and hw/arm/virt.c respectively, as a modification to the patch consistency cleanup done in patch 2. Shuuichirou Ishii (3): target-arm: delete ARM_FEATURE_A64FX target-arm: cpu64: Add support for Fujitsu A64FX target-arm: Add A64FX processor support to virt machine hw/arm/virt.c | 2 +- target/arm/cpu.h | 1 - target/arm/cpu64.c | 10 +++------- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.27.0