From: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <e.emanuelegiuseppe@gmail.com>,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] tests/9pfs: refactor test names and test devices
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 13:34:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2296259.KyODYMqAT8@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cafb215-e49e-902c-4794-bdb696a892d6@redhat.com>
On Montag, 28. September 2020 18:38:00 CEST Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/09/20 15:35, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> >> As I said, the first two patches make total sense. They would be useful
> >> for testing both packed and split virtqueues, for example. However, I
> >> think the (useful) feature is being misused here.
> >
> > I haven't understood why my suggested mult-device use case imposes a
> > misusage, but okay, unless I hear different opinions, I'll prepare a v2
> > with that (IMO hackish) CL fiddling instead in couple days or so.
>
> Because in my opinion the backend in use is a property of the test
> rather than a property of the device.
Paolo, I'm back at square one after changing to single-device model as you
suggested:
GTest: run: /x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/virtio-9p-pci/pci-
device/pci-device-tests/nop
Run QEMU with: '-M pc -device virtio-9p-pci'
(MSG: starting QEMU: exec x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -qtest unix:/tmp/
qtest-18032.sock -qtest-log /dev/null -chardev socket,path=/tmp/
qtest-18032.qmp,id=char0 -mon chardev=char0,mode=control -display none -M pc
-device virtio-9p-pci -accel qtest)
qemu-system-x86_64: -device virtio-9p-pci: 9pfs device couldn't find fsdev
with the id = NULL
Broken pipe
This fundamental virtio-9p-pci test obviously needs a complete 9p command
line, that is either a 'synth' driver one, or a 'local' one. But simply either
picking one or another is inappropriate here. This test should run once for
'synth' and once for 'local'.
Still not convinced that the multi-device route is the way to go?
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-27 10:43 [PATCH 00/12] 9pfs: add tests using local fs driver Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 01/12] tests/qtest/qgraph: add qemu_name to QOSGraphNode Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 02/12] tests/qtest/qgraph: add qos_node_create_driver_named() Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] tests/qtest/qos: add qos_dump_graph() Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] tests/qtest/qos-test: new QTEST_DUMP_GRAPH environment variable Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:39 ` [PATCH 05/12] tests/qtest/qos-test: add QTEST_DUMP_ENV " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 06/12] tests/qtest/qos-test: add environment variable QTEST_DEBUG Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28 8:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 12:11 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 07/12] test/9pfs: change export tag name to qtest-synth Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/12] tests/9pfs: refactor test names and test devices Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 8:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 11:56 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28 12:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 13:35 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-28 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-01 11:34 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2020-10-01 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-01 12:15 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-10-01 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-01 15:26 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/12] tests/9pfs: introduce local tests Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:41 ` [PATCH 10/12] tests/9pfs: wipe local 9pfs test directory Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] tests/9pfs: add virtio_9p_test_path() Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 10:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] tests/9pfs: add local Tmkdir test Christian Schoenebeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2296259.KyODYMqAT8@silver \
--to=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=e.emanuelegiuseppe@gmail.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).