qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:11:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ec8551dd17b13fb173cdbe12979761a89332948.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <632e3a8b-ee54-50e0-83a2-ea82ad8e061f@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 17:14 -0400, John Snow wrote:
> 
> On 9/12/19 6:30 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption
> > key managment to luks/qcow2 with luks.
> > 
> > This is second version of this patch set.
> > The changes are mostly addressing the review feedback,
> > plus I tested (and fixed sadly) the somewhat ugly code
> > that allows to still write share a raw luks device,
> > while preveting the key managment from happening in this case,
> > as it is unsafe.
> > I added a new iotest dedicated to that as well.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 	Maxim Levitsky
> > 
> 
> What branch is this based on?
> It doesn't seem to apply to origin/master.
> 
> --js
Hi!

Most of the refactoring patches are now on the master branch,
(one patch was dropped due to me being blind :-(), so should I resend
this patch series with the missing patch or wait for some review? 

At that stage I would like to hear about agreement/disagreement on the new APIs,
and stuff like that.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-30 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-12 22:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/11] qcrypto: add suport for amend options Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-23 13:08   ` Eric Blake
2019-09-23 13:24     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/11] qcrypto-luks: extend the create options for upcoming encryption key management Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 17:42   ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08  9:28     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 10:48       ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 11:48         ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07  7:49   ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08  9:28     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-10 13:44   ` Kevin Wolf
2019-11-08 10:04     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/11] qcrypto-luks: implement the " Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/11] block: amend: add 'force' option Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/11] block/crypto: implement the encryption key management Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 18:41   ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08  9:30     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 10:49       ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 11:04         ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 13:12           ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 13:20             ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/11] qcow2: implement crypto amend options Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/11] block: add x-blockdev-amend qmp command Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 18:53   ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08  9:26     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 10:36       ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 13:37         ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08  9:27     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07  7:53   ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 15:38     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] block/crypto: implement blockdev-amend Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07  7:58   ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 15:36     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/11] block/qcow2: " Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 19:03   ` Max Reitz
2019-10-07  8:04     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 15:14       ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 15:18     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] iotests: filter few more luks specific create options Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/11] iotests : add tests for encryption key management Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 19:11   ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08  9:28     ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-20 21:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface John Snow
2019-09-22  8:17   ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07  8:05     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-06 16:43       ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-30 17:11   ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2019-10-04 19:10 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 15:07   ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-12 11:58     ` Max Reitz
2019-11-12 12:07       ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ec8551dd17b13fb173cdbe12979761a89332948.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).