qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
	svens@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 10:50:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fcd0d94-12c7-e3b8-d6a6-3c512ae25150@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200515222032.18838-4-walling@linux.ibm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5712 bytes --]

On 5/16/20 12:20 AM, Collin Walling wrote:
> Rework the SCLP boundary check to account for different SCLP commands
> (eventually) allowing different boundary sizes.
> 
> Move the length check code into a separate function, and introduce a
> new function to determine the length of the read SCP data (i.e. the size
> from the start of the struct to where the CPU entries should begin).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/sclp.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> index 2bd618515e..987699e3c4 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,34 @@ static inline bool sclp_command_code_valid(uint32_t code)
>      return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool sccb_has_valid_boundary(uint64_t sccb_addr, uint32_t code,
> +                                    SCCBHeader *header)
> +{
> +    uint64_t current_len = sccb_addr + be16_to_cpu(header->length);
> +    uint64_t allowed_len = (sccb_addr & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE;

Those are addresses not length indications and the names should reflect
that.
Also don't we need to use PAGE_SIZE - 1?

I'm still trying to wake up, so take this with a grain of salt.

> +
> +    switch (code & SCLP_CMD_CODE_MASK) {
> +    default:
> +        if (current_len <= allowed_len) {
> +            return true;
> +        }
> +    }
> +    header->response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Calculates sufficient SCCB length to store a full Read SCP/CPU response */
> +static bool sccb_has_sufficient_len(SCCB *sccb, int num_cpus, int data_len)
> +{
> +    int required_len = data_len + num_cpus * sizeof(CPUEntry);
> +
> +    if (be16_to_cpu(sccb->h.length) < required_len) {
> +        sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INSUFFICIENT_SCCB_LENGTH);
> +        return false;
> +    }
> +    return true;
> +}

Hm, from the function name alone I'd not have expected it to also set
the response code.

> +
>  static void prepare_cpu_entries(MachineState *ms, CPUEntry *entry, int *count)
>  {
>      uint8_t features[SCCB_CPU_FEATURE_LEN] = { 0 };
> @@ -66,6 +94,16 @@ static void prepare_cpu_entries(MachineState *ms, CPUEntry *entry, int *count)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The data length denotes the start of the struct to where the first
> + * CPU entry is to be allocated. This value also denotes the offset_cpu
> + * field.
> + */
> +static int get_read_scp_info_data_len(void)
> +{
> +    return offsetof(ReadInfo, entries);
> +}

Not sure what the policy for this is, but maybe this can go into a
header file?
David and Conny will surely make that clear to me :)

> +
>  /* Provide information about the configuration, CPUs and storage */
>  static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
>  {
> @@ -74,16 +112,16 @@ static void read_SCP_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
>      int cpu_count;
>      int rnsize, rnmax;
>      IplParameterBlock *ipib = s390_ipl_get_iplb();
> +    int data_len = get_read_scp_info_data_len();
>  
> -    if (be16_to_cpu(sccb->h.length) < (sizeof(ReadInfo) + cpu_count * sizeof(CPUEntry))) {
> -        sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INSUFFICIENT_SCCB_LENGTH);
> +    if (!sccb_has_sufficient_len(sccb, machine->possible_cpus->len, data_len)) {
>          return;
>      }
>  
>      /* CPU information */
>      prepare_cpu_entries(machine, read_info->entries, &cpu_count);
>      read_info->entries_cpu = cpu_to_be16(cpu_count);
> -    read_info->offset_cpu = cpu_to_be16(offsetof(ReadInfo, entries));
> +    read_info->offset_cpu = cpu_to_be16(data_len);
>      read_info->highest_cpu = cpu_to_be16(machine->smp.max_cpus - 1);
>  
>      read_info->ibc_val = cpu_to_be32(s390_get_ibc_val());
> @@ -132,16 +170,16 @@ static void sclp_read_cpu_info(SCLPDevice *sclp, SCCB *sccb)
>  {
>      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>      ReadCpuInfo *cpu_info = (ReadCpuInfo *) sccb;
> +    int data_len = offsetof(ReadCpuInfo, entries);
>      int cpu_count;
>  
> -    if (be16_to_cpu(sccb->h.length) < (sizeof(ReadCpuInfo) + cpu_count * sizeof(CPUEntry))) {
> -        sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INSUFFICIENT_SCCB_LENGTH);
> +    if (!sccb_has_sufficient_len(sccb, machine->possible_cpus->len, data_len)) {
>          return;
>      }
>  
>      prepare_cpu_entries(machine, cpu_info->entries, &cpu_count);
>      cpu_info->nr_configured = cpu_to_be16(cpu_count);
> -    cpu_info->offset_configured = cpu_to_be16(offsetof(ReadCpuInfo, entries));
> +    cpu_info->offset_configured = cpu_to_be16(data_len);
>      cpu_info->nr_standby = cpu_to_be16(0);
>  
>      /* The standby offset is 16-byte for each CPU */
> @@ -227,6 +265,10 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
>          goto out_write;
>      }
>  
> +    if (!sccb_has_valid_boundary(sccb, code, &work_sccb.h)) {
> +        goto out_write;
> +    }
> +
>      sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
>  out_write:
>      s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb,
> @@ -272,8 +314,7 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
>          goto out_write;
>      }
>  
> -    if ((sccb + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)) > ((sccb & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE)) {
> -        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
> +    if (!sccb_has_valid_boundary(sccb, code, &work_sccb.h)) {
>          goto out_write;
>      }
>  
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-15 22:20 [PATCH v2 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-05-18  8:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 17:30     ` Collin Walling
2020-06-11 11:33   ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-05-18  8:37   ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 11:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 14:32     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-18 15:43       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-05-18 17:31         ` Collin Walling
2020-06-11 12:01   ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-15 15:47     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary and length checks Collin Walling
2020-05-18  8:50   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-05-18 15:15     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-19 13:19       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-25 10:53         ` Janosch Frank
2020-06-11 12:56   ` Thomas Huth
2020-06-15 15:47     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on sccb length Collin Walling
2020-06-11 13:05   ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-06-11 14:33   ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-05-18  8:55   ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-18 14:31     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-25 10:50       ` Janosch Frank
2020-05-26 14:38         ` Collin Walling
2020-05-19 13:47     ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-05-15 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-05-20 11:30   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-21  6:18     ` Collin Walling
2020-05-16  6:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 no-reply
2020-05-18 17:34   ` Collin Walling
2020-05-18 17:51     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fcd0d94-12c7-e3b8-d6a6-3c512ae25150@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).