Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Implement drain_call_rcu and use it in hmp_device_del

[Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 13:42 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > This allows to preserve the semantics of hmp_device_del,
> > that the device is deleted immediatly which was changed by previos
> > patch that delayed this to RCU callback
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/qemu/rcu.h |  1 +
> >  qdev-monitor.c     |  3 +++
> >  util/rcu.c         | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/qemu/rcu.h b/include/qemu/rcu.h
> > index 570aa603eb..0e375ebe13 100644
> > --- a/include/qemu/rcu.h
> > +++ b/include/qemu/rcu.h
> > @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ struct rcu_head {
> >  };
> >  
> >  extern void call_rcu1(struct rcu_head *head, RCUCBFunc *func);
> > +extern void drain_call_rcu(void);
> >  
> >  /* The operands of the minus operator must have the same type,
> >   * which must be the one that we specify in the cast.
> > diff --git a/qdev-monitor.c b/qdev-monitor.c
> > index 56cee1483f..70877840a2 100644
> > --- a/qdev-monitor.c
> > +++ b/qdev-monitor.c
> > @@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ void qmp_device_add(QDict *qdict, QObject **ret_data, Error **errp)
> >          return;
> >      }
> >      dev = qdev_device_add(opts, &local_err);
> > +    drain_call_rcu();
> > +
> >      if (!dev) {
> >          error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> >          qemu_opts_del(opts);
> > @@ -904,6 +906,7 @@ void qmp_device_del(const char *id, Error **errp)
> >          }
> >  
> >          qdev_unplug(dev, errp);
> > +        drain_call_rcu();
> >      }
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Subject claims "in hmp_device_del", code has it in qmp_device_add() and
> qmp_device_del().  Please advise.

I added it in both, because addition of a device can fail and trigger removal,
which can also be now delayed due to RCU.
Since both device_add and device_del aren't used often, the overhead won't
be a problem IMHO.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

> 
> [...]