qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, rvkagan@yandex-team.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.0] block/nbd: fix possible use after free of s->connect_thread
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:32:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38417b0c-497f-1c41-d35e-8167bda0c2f7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8cd91ca-ae7f-49b0-c98a-f5a9b392a7ac@virtuozzo.com>

On 13.04.21 14:19, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 13.04.2021 14:53, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 06.04.21 17:51, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> If on nbd_close() we detach the thread (in
>>> nbd_co_establish_connection_cancel() thr->state becomes
>>> CONNECT_THREAD_RUNNING_DETACHED), after that point we should not use
>>> s->connect_thread (which is set to NULL), as running thread may free it
>>> at any time.
>>>
>>> Still nbd_co_establish_connection() does exactly this: it saves
>>> s->connect_thread to local variable (just for better code style) and
>>> use it even after yield point, when thread may be already detached.
>>>
>>> Fix that. Also check thr to be non-NULL on
>>> nbd_co_establish_connection() start for safety.
>>>
>>> After this patch "case CONNECT_THREAD_RUNNING_DETACHED" becomes
>>> impossible in the second switch in nbd_co_establish_connection().
>>> Still, don't add extra abort() just before the release. If it somehow
>>> possible to reach this "case:" it won't hurt. Anyway, good refactoring
>>> of all this reconnect mess will come soon.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi all! I faced a crash, just running 277 iotest in a loop. I can't
>>> reproduce it on master, it reproduces only on my branch with nbd
>>> reconnect refactorings.
>>>
>>> Still, it seems very possible that it may crash under some conditions.
>>> So I propose this patch for 6.0. It's written so that it's obvious that
>>> it will not hurt:
>>>
>>>   pre-patch, on first hunk we'll just crash if thr is NULL,
>>>   on second hunk it's safe to return -1, and using thr when
>>>   s->connect_thread is already zeroed is obviously wrong.
>>>
>>>   block/nbd.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
>>> index c26dc5a54f..1d4668d42d 100644
>>> --- a/block/nbd.c
>>> +++ b/block/nbd.c
>>> @@ -443,6 +443,11 @@ nbd_co_establish_connection(BlockDriverState 
>>> *bs, Error **errp)
>>>       BDRVNBDState *s = bs->opaque;
>>>       NBDConnectThread *thr = s->connect_thread;
>>> +    if (!thr) {
>>> +        /* detached */
>>> +        return -1;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>>       qemu_mutex_lock(&thr->mutex);
>>>       switch (thr->state) {
>>
>> First, it is a bit strange not to set *errp in these cases. 
> 
> Oops, right! ashamed)

OK, so who cares.  It wouldn’t do anything anyway.

Apart from that, all the changes do is to turn use after frees or 
immediate NULL dereferences into clean errors.  I can’t see any 
resources that should be cleaned up, so I hope Coverity won’t hate me 
for taking this patch.

And then we’ll see whether Peter will take the pull request...

Max



      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-13 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-06 15:51 [PATCH for-6.0] block/nbd: fix possible use after free of s->connect_thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-06 16:20 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-07 19:47   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-12  8:45 ` Roman Kagan
2021-04-12  8:53   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-13 11:53 ` Max Reitz
2021-04-13 12:19   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-04-13 13:32     ` Max Reitz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38417b0c-497f-1c41-d35e-8167bda0c2f7@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rvkagan@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).