From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABACC433ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A5861077 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:54:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 18A5861077 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYRYA-0005R5-7M for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:54:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYRDq-00082m-53 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:33:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYRDo-0008GK-5G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 06:33:41 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD43FADAA; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFC v14 52/80] tests: device-introspect-test: cope with ARM TCG-only devices To: Thomas Huth , Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Richard Henderson , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= References: <20210416162824.25131-1-cfontana@suse.de> <20210416162824.25131-53-cfontana@suse.de> <75c0236b-a8f1-c462-355b-945e509d90f5@redhat.com> <50171d6a-21dc-3017-c8f9-8d068fd843f5@suse.de> <653b0188-c909-ba0c-00b2-735fb25d6703@redhat.com> From: Claudio Fontana Message-ID: <3ab0e4d3-1494-95cf-e4a9-1b9ef968e7b9@suse.de> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:33:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <653b0188-c909-ba0c-00b2-735fb25d6703@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.220.15; envelope-from=cfontana@suse.de; helo=mx2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Roman Bolshakov , Eduardo Habkost , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 4/19/21 12:29 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 19/04/2021 12.24, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> On 4/19/21 12:22 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> On 16/04/2021 18.27, Claudio Fontana wrote: >>>> Skip the test_device_intro_concrete for now for ARM KVM-only build, >>>> as on ARM we currently build devices for ARM that are not >>>> compatible with a KVM-only build. >>>> >>>> We can remove this workaround when we fix this in KConfig etc, >>>> and we only list and build machines that are compatible with KVM >>>> for KVM-only builds. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana >>>> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé >>>> --- >>>> tests/qtest/device-introspect-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/device-introspect-test.c b/tests/qtest/device-introspect-test.c >>>> index bbec166dbc..1ff15e2247 100644 >>>> --- a/tests/qtest/device-introspect-test.c >>>> +++ b/tests/qtest/device-introspect-test.c >>>> @@ -329,12 +329,30 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >>>> qtest_add_func("device/introspect/none", test_device_intro_none); >>>> qtest_add_func("device/introspect/abstract", test_device_intro_abstract); >>>> qtest_add_func("device/introspect/abstract-interfaces", test_abstract_interfaces); >>>> + >>>> + /* >>>> + * XXX currently we build also boards for ARM that are incompatible with KVM. >>>> + * We therefore need to check this explicitly, and only test virt for kvm-only >>>> + * arm builds. >>>> + * After we do the work of Kconfig etc to ensure that only KVM-compatible boards >>>> + * are built for the kvm-only build, we could remove this. >>>> + */ >>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_TCG >>>> + { >>>> + const char *arch = qtest_get_arch(); >>>> + if (strcmp(arch, "arm") == 0 || strcmp(arch, "aarch64") == 0) { >>>> + goto add_machine_test_done; >>>> + } >>>> + } >>>> +#endif /* !CONFIG_TCG */ >>>> if (g_test_quick()) { >>>> qtest_add_data_func("device/introspect/concrete/defaults/none", >>>> g_strdup(common_args), test_device_intro_concrete); >>>> } else { >>>> qtest_cb_for_every_machine(add_machine_test_case, true); >>>> } >>>> + goto add_machine_test_done; >>> >>> That last goto does not make much sense, since the label is right below. >> >> It is necessary to remove the warning that is otherwise produced about the unused label IIRC. > > Ah, ok. > > Alternatively, you could maybe also drop the label completely and simply > write the #ifndef block above like this (note the "else"): > > #ifndef CONFIG_TCG > const char *arch = qtest_get_arch(); > if (!strcmp(arch, "arm") || !strcmp(arch, "aarch64")) { > /* Do nothing */ > } > else > #endif /* !CONFIG_TCG */ > > ... not sure what's nicer, though. > > Thomas > Indeed, I tried a couple of combinations, in the end to me the less confusing was the goto one, the #ifdef containing an open else is in my opinion worse, more error-prone, but I am open to additional comments/ideas. Thanks, Claudio