Re: General question about parsing an rbd filename

[Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>]

On 4/9/21 9:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com> writes:
>> block/rbd.c hints that:
>>
>>>   * Configuration values containing :, @, or = can be escaped with a
>>>   * leading "\".
>>
>> Right now, much of the parsing code will allow anyone to escape
>> _anything_ so long as it's preceded by '\'.
>>
>> Is this the intended behavior? Or should the parser be updated to
>> allow escaping only certain sequences.
> 
> I can't answer this question, but perhaps I can get us a bit closer to
> an answer.
> 
> The commend you quoted in part is about "rbd:" pseudo-filenames.
> 
> By "parsing code", you probably mean qemu_rbd_parse_filename().  It uses
> qemu_rbd_next_tok() to split off one part after the other, stopping at a
> special delimiter character, and qemu_rbd_unescape() to unescape most,
> but not all parts.
> 
> Both treat '\' followed by a character other than '\0' specially.
> qemu_rbd_next_tok() doesn't stop at an escaped delimiter character.
> qemu_rbd_unescape() unescapes escaped characters.
> 
> I believe the comment you quoted is basically trying to say "to use a
> character that would normally be a delimiter, escape it with '\'".  It
> doesn't say these are the only characters you may escape.

I agree with your interpretation here.

> Not unescaping some parts feels iffy to me.

I wonder if my reading of it placed too much emphasis on the 
"Configuration values" part of it, which I understand to be the optional 
key,value pairs that come after the image name.

Thank you,

Connor