From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377AAC432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05EC3206DC for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:38:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 05EC3206DC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:60304 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVJ4y-0003Jj-6N for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:38:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVJ46-0002po-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:37:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVJ45-0005so-G9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:37:54 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:4446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVJ45-0005sC-8a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:37:53 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAEHXbFl050124 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:37:51 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w9a9xk6hb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:37:51 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:37:48 -0000 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:37:44 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xAEHbh2U47055136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:37:43 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473D15204E; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:37:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3016276355.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.222.27]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0748B52052; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:37:43 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390x: kvm-unit-tests: a PONG device for Sub Channels tests To: Halil Pasic , Cornelia Huck References: <1573671753-15115-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20191114113823.5d752648.cohuck@redhat.com> <20191114140235.30a788d6.pasic@linux.ibm.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:37:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191114140235.30a788d6.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19111417-0008-0000-0000-0000032F0DFD X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19111417-0009-0000-0000-00004A4E1DD4 Message-Id: <558e18e3-631b-bf85-e6be-b43308a2acfc@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-14_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1910280000 definitions=main-1911140152 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 148.163.156.1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2019-11-14 14:02, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:38:23 +0100 > Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:02:33 +0100 >> Pierre Morel wrote: >> >> Minor nit for $SUBJECT: this isn't a kvm-unit-tests patch, that's just >> one consumer :) > And subchannel is one word in s390-speak. OK, surely better for grep > > [..] > >> Some questions regarding this device and its intended usage: >> >> - What are you trying to test? Basic ccw processing, or something more >> specific? Is there any way you can use the kvm-unit-test >> infrastructure to test basic processing with an existing device? > I'm also curious about the big picture (what is in scope and what out > of scope). Your design should be evaluated in the light of intended > usage. > > BTW have you had a look at this abandoned patch-set of mine: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-11/msg04220.html No, but now yes. Yes, it is something similar, I can remember as you did it. > > We made some different design decisions, while aiming essentially for the > same. Maybe it's due to different scope, maybe not. For instance one > can't test IDA with PONG, I guess. No not now. Regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel IBM Lab Boeblingen