From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR2Rh-000584-IX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:46:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aR2Re-0006DO-E9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 13:46:29 -0500 References: <1453978470-222624-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <1453978688-222752-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <20160128140212.GS3869@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20160128180031.1d940e2f@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20160203175504.GI26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <56B24AFC.7000706@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:46:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160203175504.GI26314@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qdev & hw/core owner? (was Re: [PATCH v19 7/9] machine: add properties to compat_props incrementaly) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost , Igor Mammedov Cc: agraf@suse.de, Peter Maydell , mst@redhat.com, ghammer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann , cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= , david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On 02/03/16 18:55, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:00:31PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > [...] >> It looks like this series might go nowhere but this patch >> is not tied to it and useful to us in general >> so perhaps you could pick it up after ACKs from >> S390/SPAPR maintainers. >> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > > We don't have a maintainer for hw/core/machine.c, hw/core/qdev*, > and related files. > > Assuming we don't have a volunteer to maintain them officially, > can we agree on a default destination for those patches so they > don't linger on the list? Michael? Andreas? Preferably someone who is otherwise not incessantly overloaded by patches to review. Just my two cents. Laszlo