From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTtpU-0001wJ-Gp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:10:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTtpQ-0001kJ-DQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:10:52 -0500 References: <1455206609-28009-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1455206609-28009-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> From: Sergey Fedorov Message-ID: <56BCB279.8050403@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:10:33 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1455206609-28009-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/6] target-arm: correct CNTFRQ access rights List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org On 11.02.2016 19:03, Peter Maydell wrote: > Correct some corner cases we were getting wrong for > CNTFRQ access rights: > * should UNDEF from 32-bit Secure EL1 > * only writable from the highest implemented exception level, > which might not be EL1 now > > To clarify the code, provide a new utility function > arm_highest_el() which returns the highest implemented > exception level. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov > --- > Rewritten to use arm_highest_el() to improve clarity > --- > target-arm/cpu.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > target-arm/helper.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h > index 5137632..afbf366 100644 > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h > @@ -1255,6 +1255,18 @@ static inline bool cptype_valid(int cptype) > #define PL1_RW (PL1_R | PL1_W) > #define PL0_RW (PL0_R | PL0_W) > > +/* Return the highest implemented Exception Level */ > +static inline int arm_highest_el(CPUARMState *env) > +{ > + if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) { > + return 3; > + } > + if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2)) { > + return 2; > + } > + return 1; > +} > + > /* Return the current Exception Level (as per ARMv8; note that this differs > * from the ARMv7 Privilege Level). > */ > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c > index 2f9db72..4d27c00 100644 > --- a/target-arm/helper.c > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c > @@ -1218,10 +1218,33 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo v6k_cp_reginfo[] = { > static CPAccessResult gt_cntfrq_access(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, > bool isread) > { > - /* CNTFRQ: not visible from PL0 if both PL0PCTEN and PL0VCTEN are zero */ > - if (arm_current_el(env) == 0 && !extract32(env->cp15.c14_cntkctl, 0, 2)) { > - return CP_ACCESS_TRAP; > + /* CNTFRQ: not visible from PL0 if both PL0PCTEN and PL0VCTEN are zero. > + * Writable only at the highest implemented exception level. > + */ > + int el = arm_current_el(env); > + > + switch (el) { > + case 0: > + if (!extract32(env->cp15.c14_cntkctl, 0, 2)) { > + return CP_ACCESS_TRAP; > + } > + break; > + case 1: > + if (!isread && ri->state == ARM_CP_STATE_AA32 && > + arm_is_secure_below_el3(env)) { > + /* Accesses from 32-bit Secure EL1 UNDEF (*not* trap to EL3!) */ > + return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED; > + } > + break; > + case 2: > + case 3: > + break; > } > + > + if (!isread && el < arm_highest_el(env)) { > + return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_UNCATEGORIZED; > + } > + > return CP_ACCESS_OK; > } >