Re: [PATCH v3 19/28] tcg: Tidy split_cross_256mb

[Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>]

On 6/9/21 7:59 AM, Luis Fernando Fujita Pires wrote:
> From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> Return output buffer and size via output pointer arguments, rather than
>> returning size via tcg_ctx->code_gen_buffer_size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   tcg/region.c | 15 +++++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tcg/region.c b/tcg/region.c index b44246e1aa..652f328d2c 100644
>> --- a/tcg/region.c
>> +++ b/tcg/region.c
>> @@ -467,7 +467,8 @@ static inline bool cross_256mb(void *addr, size_t size)
>>   /* We weren't able to allocate a buffer without crossing that boundary,
>>      so make do with the larger portion of the buffer that doesn't cross.
>>      Returns the new base of the buffer, and adjusts code_gen_buffer_size.  */ -
>> static inline void *split_cross_256mb(void *buf1, size_t size1)
>> +static inline void split_cross_256mb(void **obuf, size_t *osize,
>> +                                     void *buf1, size_t size1)
> 
> Need to adjust the comment, now that we're no longer adjusting code_gen_buffer_size in here.

Done, thanks.

>> @@ -583,8 +583,7 @@ static bool alloc_code_gen_buffer_anon(size_t size, int
>> prot,
>>               /* fallthru */
>>           default:
>>               /* Split the original buffer.  Free the smaller half.  */
>> -            buf2 = split_cross_256mb(buf, size);
>> -            size2 = tcg_ctx->code_gen_buffer_size;
>> +            split_cross_256mb(&buf2, &size2, buf, size);
> 
> This will be fixed by patch 21 (tcg: Allocate code_gen_buffer into struct tcg_region_state), but shouldn't we update tcg_ctx->code_gen_buffer_size here?

Good catch.  I moved the store to _size from above to below.


r~