From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8A5C433DB for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CD464DDC for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:49:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 84CD464DDC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kaod.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lE5yb-0005Hy-8K for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:49:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lE5y3-0004sT-0r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:49:19 -0500 Received: from smtpout1.mo804.mail-out.ovh.net ([79.137.123.220]:46751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lE5xz-0006JB-RJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 02:49:18 -0500 Received: from mxplan5.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.20.195]) by mo804.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBC58FCA5EF; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:49:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from kaod.org (37.59.142.99) by DAG4EX1.mxp5.local (172.16.2.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:49:03 +0100 Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-99G003ada80037-fa8f-42c3-8681-c64b0202c55d, 22411CCD660FC3FC09311B18737C076FF65DC705) smtp.auth=clg@kaod.org X-OVh-ClientIp: 82.64.250.170 Subject: Re: who's using the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches ? To: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=a9dric_Le_Goater?= Message-ID: <6143afc2-fb51-7164-afec-052d74edb478@kaod.org> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:49:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.99] X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG8EX1.mxp5.local (172.16.2.71) To DAG4EX1.mxp5.local (172.16.2.31) X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 0d105f45-dc9f-4243-832e-35d3c9f51811 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 7057140617497775002 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkedvgdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfhisehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeevrogurhhitggpnfgvpgfiohgrthgvrhcuoegtlhhgsehkrghougdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheeghfehlefgueduvdevgedvjefgtedvvdfhtedugefgheetleevieegjeelhffgnecuffhomhgrihhnpehoiihlrggsshdrohhrghenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpfeejrdehledrudegvddrleelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpqdhouhhtpdhhvghlohepmhigphhlrghnhedrmhgrihhlrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtlhhgsehkrghougdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghtvghrrdhmrgihuggvlhhlsehlihhnrghrohdrohhrgh Received-SPF: pass client-ip=79.137.123.220; envelope-from=clg@kaod.org; helo=smtpout1.mo804.mail-out.ovh.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2/19/21 5:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Does anybody use the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches, > either occasionally or on a regular basis ? > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ > The admins for that system are trying to identify which of > the various projects are really using their patchwork instances, > so I figured I'd do a quick survey here. We don't use it > as an official project tool but it's certainly possible to > use it as an individual developer in one way or another. > > (Personally I am in the "occasionally it's useful for finding > a patch which didn't get archived by patchew or the 'patches' > tool for some reason" camp at the moment.) I do on a regular basis. Thanks, C.