From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@aj.id.au>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
berrange@redhat.com, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Cameron Esfahani via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] aspeed: Don't create unwanted "ftgmac100", "aspeed-mmi" devices
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:44:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ad3605d-3233-378e-5c37-ed4afbacfc66@kaod.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cfcba4e-1237-8eb9-7c83-490729f082fe@redhat.com>
On 5/19/20 1:42 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/19/20 7:45 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@aj.id.au> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 18 May 2020, at 21:49, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> On 5/18/20 7:03 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>> These devices are optional, and controlled by @nb_nics.
>>>>> aspeed_soc_ast2600_init() and aspeed_soc_init() create the maximum
>>>>> supported number. aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize() and
>>>>> aspeed_soc_realize() realize only the wanted number. Works, although
>>>>> it can leave unrealized devices hanging around in the QOM composition
>>>>> tree. Affects machines ast2500-evb, ast2600-evb, palmetto-bmc,
>>>>> romulus-bmc, swift-bmc, tacoma-bmc, and witherspoon-bmc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Make the init functions create only the wanted ones. Visible in "info
>>>>> qom-tree"; here's the change for ast2600-evb:
>>>>>
>>>>> /machine (ast2600-evb-machine)
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> /soc (ast2600-a1)
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> /ftgmac100[0] (ftgmac100)
>>>>> /ftgmac100[0] (qemu:memory-region)
>>>>> - /ftgmac100[1] (ftgmac100)
>>>>> - /ftgmac100[2] (ftgmac100)
>>>>> - /ftgmac100[3] (ftgmac100)
>>>>> /gpio (aspeed.gpio-ast2600)
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> /mii[0] (aspeed-mmi)
>>>>> /aspeed-mmi[0] (qemu:memory-region)
>>>>> - /mii[1] (aspeed-mmi)
>>>>> - /mii[2] (aspeed-mmi)
>>>>> - /mii[3] (aspeed-mmi)
>>>>> /rtc (aspeed.rtc)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure creating @nb_nics devices makes sense. How many does the
>>>>> physical chip provide?
>>>>
>>>> The AST2400, AST2500 SoC have 2 macs and the AST2600 has 4. Each machine
>>>> define the one it uses, generally MAC0 but the tacoma board uses MAC3.
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't the model reflect the real address space independently from
>>>> the NIC backends defined on the command line ?
>
> If the SoC has N ftgmac100 peripherals, you need to mmio-map the N instances,
> else your guest will get MEMTX_DECODE_ERROR trying to access it, regardless
> command line NIC plugged.
yes. This is what I do with the patch attached below but I have another
problem.
Get a witherspoon-tacoma flash image :
https://openpower.xyz/job/openbmc-build/distro=ubuntu,label=builder,target=witherspoon-tacoma/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/deploy/images/witherspoon-tacoma/flash-witherspoon-tacoma
Run :
qemu-system-arm -M tacoma-bmc -nic user -drive file=./flash-witherspoon-tacoma,format=raw,if=mtd -nographic -nodefaults -serial mon:stdio
qemu-system-arm: warning: nic ftgmac100.0 has no peer
qemu-system-arm: warning: nic ftgmac100.1 has no peer
qemu-system-arm: warning: nic ftgmac100.3 has no peer
U-Boot 2019.04 (May 06 2020 - 04:20:01 +0000)
SOC: AST2600-A1
LPC Mode: SIO:Enable : SuperIO-2e
Eth: MAC0: RMII/NCSI, MAC1: RMII/NCSI, MAC2: RMII/NCSI, MAC3: RMII/NCSI
Model: Tacoma
DRAM: already initialized, 1008 MiB
...
How do I deal with the "no peer" warnings ?
Thanks,
C.
From a3c2772eca8a541158345e6f219ce524f1bc017b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?C=C3=A9dric=20Le=20Goater?= <clg@kaod.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:39:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] arm/aspeed: Rework NIC attachment
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---
include/hw/arm/aspeed.h | 1 +
include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h | 1 +
hw/arm/aspeed.c | 5 +++++
hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c | 9 +++++++--
hw/arm/aspeed_soc.c | 10 ++++++++--
5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/arm/aspeed.h b/include/hw/arm/aspeed.h
index 18521484b90e..7e71152b3554 100644
--- a/include/hw/arm/aspeed.h
+++ b/include/hw/arm/aspeed.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ typedef struct AspeedMachineClass {
const char *fmc_model;
const char *spi_model;
uint32_t num_cs;
+ uint32_t nic_mask;
void (*i2c_init)(AspeedBoardState *bmc);
} AspeedMachineClass;
diff --git a/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h b/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
index 914115f3ef77..32e9a232a049 100644
--- a/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
+++ b/include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ typedef struct AspeedSoCState {
AspeedSDMCState sdmc;
AspeedWDTState wdt[ASPEED_WDTS_NUM];
FTGMAC100State ftgmac100[ASPEED_MACS_NUM];
+ uint32_t nic_mask;
AspeedMiiState mii[ASPEED_MACS_NUM];
AspeedGPIOState gpio;
AspeedGPIOState gpio_1_8v;
diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
index 6f8f4b88f8ab..338b5db20cf9 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
@@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ static void aspeed_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
&error_abort);
object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&bmc->soc), amc->num_cs, "num-cs",
&error_abort);
+ object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&bmc->soc), amc->nic_mask, "nic-mask",
+ &error_abort);
object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&bmc->soc), OBJECT(&bmc->ram_container),
"dram", &error_abort);
if (machine->kernel_filename) {
@@ -556,12 +558,14 @@ static int aspeed_soc_num_cpus(const char *soc_name)
static void aspeed_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
{
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+ AspeedMachineClass *amc = ASPEED_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
mc->init = aspeed_machine_init;
mc->no_floppy = 1;
mc->no_cdrom = 1;
mc->no_parallel = 1;
mc->default_ram_id = "ram";
+ amc->nic_mask = 1; /* First NIC */
aspeed_machine_class_props_init(oc);
}
@@ -698,6 +702,7 @@ static void aspeed_machine_tacoma_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
amc->fmc_model = "mx66l1g45g";
amc->spi_model = "mx66l1g45g";
amc->num_cs = 2;
+ amc->nic_mask = 0x4; /* third NIC */
amc->i2c_init = witherspoon_bmc_i2c_init; /* Same board layout */
mc->default_ram_size = 1 * GiB;
mc->default_cpus = mc->min_cpus = mc->max_cpus =
diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c
index 114b94f8f44d..0e303c3018e7 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast2600.c
@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_GET_CLASS(s);
Error *err = NULL, *local_err = NULL;
qemu_irq irq;
+ NICInfo *nd = &nd_table[0];
/* IO space */
create_unimplemented_device("aspeed_soc.io", sc->memmap[ASPEED_IOMEM],
@@ -462,8 +463,12 @@ static void aspeed_soc_ast2600_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
}
/* Net */
- for (i = 0; i < nb_nics && i < sc->macs_num; i++) {
- qdev_set_nic_properties(DEVICE(&s->ftgmac100[i]), &nd_table[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < sc->macs_num; i++) {
+ if ((s->nic_mask & (1 << i)) && nd->used) {
+ qemu_check_nic_model(nd, TYPE_FTGMAC100);
+ qdev_set_nic_properties(DEVICE(&s->ftgmac100[i]), nd);
+ nd++;
+ }
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->ftgmac100[i]), true, "aspeed",
&err);
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->ftgmac100[i]), true, "realized",
diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.c
index 984d29087dce..cc4f6769e763 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.c
@@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
AspeedSoCState *s = ASPEED_SOC(dev);
AspeedSoCClass *sc = ASPEED_SOC_GET_CLASS(s);
Error *err = NULL, *local_err = NULL;
+ NICInfo *nd = &nd_table[0];
/* IO space */
create_unimplemented_device("aspeed_soc.io", sc->memmap[ASPEED_IOMEM],
@@ -405,8 +406,12 @@ static void aspeed_soc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
}
/* Net */
- for (i = 0; i < nb_nics && i < sc->macs_num; i++) {
- qdev_set_nic_properties(DEVICE(&s->ftgmac100[i]), &nd_table[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < sc->macs_num; i++) {
+ if ((s->nic_mask & (1 << i)) && nd->used) {
+ qemu_check_nic_model(nd, TYPE_FTGMAC100);
+ qdev_set_nic_properties(DEVICE(&s->ftgmac100[i]), nd);
+ nd++;
+ }
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->ftgmac100[i]), true, "aspeed",
&err);
object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&s->ftgmac100[i]), true, "realized",
@@ -455,6 +460,7 @@ static void aspeed_soc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
aspeed_soc_get_irq(s, ASPEED_SDHCI));
}
static Property aspeed_soc_properties[] = {
+ DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("nic-mask", AspeedSoCState, nic_mask, 0x1),
DEFINE_PROP_LINK("dram", AspeedSoCState, dram_mr, TYPE_MEMORY_REGION,
MemoryRegion *),
DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 5:03 [PATCH 00/24] Fixes around device realization Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 01/24] arm/stm32f405: Fix realization of "stm32f2xx-adc" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 16:48 ` Alistair Francis
2020-05-19 5:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-19 22:20 ` Alistair Francis
2020-05-27 9:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-27 11:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 02/24] display/xlnx_dp: Fix to realize "i2c-ddc" and "aux-to-i2c-bridge" Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:19 ` Fred Konrad
2020-05-19 5:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-19 9:48 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-19 12:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 9:59 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2020-05-18 10:30 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-18 11:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-19 5:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 16:56 ` Alistair Francis
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 03/24] sd/pxa2xx_mmci: Fix to realize "pxa2xx-mmci" device Markus Armbruster
2020-05-21 16:20 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 04/24] aspeed: Don't create unwanted "ftgmac100", "aspeed-mmi" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 12:19 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-19 0:20 ` Andrew Jeffery
2020-05-19 5:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-19 11:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-19 12:44 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2020-05-19 0:38 ` Joel Stanley
2020-05-19 5:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 05/24] aspeed: Don't create unwanted "cortex-a7-arm-cpu" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 12:24 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-19 0:40 ` Joel Stanley
2020-05-19 5:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-19 9:35 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 06/24] armv7m: Bury unwanted "ARM,bitband-memory" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-21 16:17 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-25 5:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-25 12:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-25 12:49 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-26 5:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 07/24] auxbus: Fix aux-to-i2c-bridge to be a subtype of aux-slave Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 08/24] mac_via: Fix to realize "mos6522-q800-via*" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 20:25 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 09/24] macio: Fix to realize "mos6522-cuda" and "mos6522-pmu" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-21 16:26 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-25 6:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-27 14:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-27 15:05 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-27 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 6:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-27 16:08 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 10/24] macio: Bury unwanted "macio-gpio" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 20:35 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-05-19 6:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 11/24] pnv/phb4: Bury unwanted "pnv-phb4-pec-stack" devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:49 ` Greg Kurz
2020-05-18 13:24 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-19 8:16 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-19 11:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 12/24] MAINTAINERS: Make section PowerNV cover pci-host/pnv* as well Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 6:41 ` David Gibson
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 13/24] ppc4xx: Drop redundant device realization Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-18 10:27 ` BALATON Zoltan
2020-05-19 6:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 16:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 14/24] macio: Put "macio-nvram" device on the macio bus Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 20:37 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-05-18 5:03 ` [PATCH 15/24] macio: Fix macio-bus to be a subtype of System bus Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:55 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-18 20:39 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-05-19 6:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 16/24] ppc/pnv: Put "*-pnv-chip" and "pnv-xive" on the main system bus Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 16:34 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-19 6:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-19 13:05 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 17/24] pnv/psi: Correct the pnv-psi* devices not to be sysbus devices Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 16:27 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-19 6:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-19 13:04 ` Cédric Le Goater
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 18/24] display/sm501 display/ati: Fix to realize "i2c-ddc" Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 10:32 ` BALATON Zoltan
2020-05-19 6:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 10:39 ` BALATON Zoltan
2020-05-18 10:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-19 6:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 19/24] riscv: Fix to put "riscv.hart_array" devices on sysbus Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 17:03 ` Alistair Francis
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 20/24] riscv: Fix type of SiFive[EU]SocState, member parent_obj Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:58 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-18 16:57 ` Alistair Francis
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 21/24] sparc/leon3: Fix to put grlib,* devices on sysbus Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 8:09 ` Fred Konrad
2020-05-18 8:59 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 22/24] qdev: Assert devices are plugged into a bus that can take them Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 15:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 20:42 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 23/24] sd: Hide the qdev-but-not-quite thing created by sd_init() Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 5:04 ` [PATCH 24/24] qdev: Assert onboard devices all get realized properly Markus Armbruster
2020-05-18 9:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ad3605d-3233-378e-5c37-ed4afbacfc66@kaod.org \
--to=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).