qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Schoenebeck via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	"Christian Schoenebeck" <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Antonios Motakis" <antonios.motakis@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/3] 9p: Fix file ID collisions
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:03:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7439377.rdf1oF7g69@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190923164653.5b79797a@bahia.lan>

On Montag, 23. September 2019 16:46:53 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > > I'll do some
> > > > > more manual testing and issue a PR when I'm confident enough.
> > > > 
> > > > That would be highly appreciated! So far I am the only one ever having
> > > > tested this patch set at all!
> > > 
> > > Just to clarify, I won't thoroughly test it. My main concern is that it
> > > doesn't break things.
> > 
> > So in other words you are only going to test the default behaviour
> > --multidevs=warn?
> 
> This I've already done, along with multidevs=forbid.
> 
> Now I plan to run the PJD test suite from Tuxera with a simple
> cross-device setup and --multidevs=remap. And that's it.

Well, Ok then, however at least some simple, manual, final "ls -i" of the 
inode numbers on guest would not hurt though. ;-)

> > If yes, and since that would mean I was the only person ever having tested
> > the actual fix, shouldn't --multidevs=remap|forbid better be marked as
> > experimental (docs and runtime warning) for now? Maybe that would also
> > anticipate receiving feedback from people actually using it later on.
> Makes sense. I don't think it is worth having a runtime warning,
> but I'll turn remap to x-remap and amend the docs.

Mwa, I would like to veto against your "x-remap" plan though. Keep in mind I 
also have to send out a patch for libvirt for this fix. Even I would not have 
read "x" to stand for "experimental". So I would definitely favor a runtime 
warning instead of renaming that parameter.

I can send a patch on top for docs and warning if you want.




  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-05 10:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/3] 9p: Fix file ID collisions Christian Schoenebeck via Qemu-devel
2019-09-04 21:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/3] 9p: Added virtfs option 'multidevs=remap|forbid|warn' Christian Schoenebeck via Qemu-devel
2019-09-04 22:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/3] 9p: stat_to_qid: implement slow path Christian Schoenebeck via Qemu-devel
2019-09-04 22:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/3] 9p: Use variable length suffixes for inode remapping Christian Schoenebeck via Qemu-devel
2019-09-13 17:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/3] 9p: Fix file ID collisions Greg Kurz
2019-09-23  9:50   ` Christian Schoenebeck via
2019-09-23 12:56     ` Greg Kurz
2019-09-23 14:06       ` Christian Schoenebeck via
2019-09-23 14:46         ` Greg Kurz
2019-09-23 15:03           ` Christian Schoenebeck via [this message]
2019-09-23 16:50             ` Greg Kurz
2019-09-24  9:31               ` Christian Schoenebeck via
2019-10-08  9:14                 ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-08 12:05                   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2019-10-08 13:47                     ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-08 14:25                       ` Christian Schoenebeck
2019-10-08 14:45                         ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-15  9:20                     ` Greg Kurz
2019-10-16  9:42                       ` virtio-fs: Fix file ID collisions (was: 9p: Fix file ID collisions) Christian Schoenebeck
2019-10-16 13:44                         ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-10-18 13:15                           ` Christian Schoenebeck
2019-10-16 14:00                         ` Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7439377.rdf1oF7g69@silver \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=antonios.motakis@huawei.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).