From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391D6C433B4 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72EE5610A5 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:42:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 72EE5610A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHQJ-00088d-Db for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:42:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHP1-0007ee-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:40:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:42264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHOy-0003O5-3N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:40:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619505654; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nUzXVkOwMrVTbM1o7/K4W/oypU9K4I/fEOeh6DCyyfo=; b=Fos8gNRwRPVGmhH0Ki+qXhPEPgAmEyqvMWeRElokMxzWsBLfo8h1LL0t2xbyxT9avyrNBs JrZbeHXWSkYRgMjexPs7D40Sl8oFRY5pByms0asxsmV4BLaOMdoM1X+xuUBZrPagnupEMO zkAhhrAYaTGNT1MoNQ+pymI585DmIqc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-430-5ShvQ6UFO2GruDnvJ2TvAw-1; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:40:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5ShvQ6UFO2GruDnvJ2TvAw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B281718B6142 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wangxiaodeMacBook-Air.local (ovpn-13-153.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.153]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFA853CC6; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 06:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] virtio-pci:decouple virtqueue from interrupt setting process To: Cindy Lu , mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20210427033951.29805-1-lulu@redhat.com> <20210427033951.29805-3-lulu@redhat.com> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: <78e0debd-a63f-cffc-b252-b138fef4c12d@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:40:44 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210427033951.29805-3-lulu@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=jasowang@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=jasowang@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.219, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" ÔÚ 2021/4/27 ÉÏÎç11:39, Cindy Lu дµÀ: > Now the code for interrupt/vector are coupling > with the vq number, this patch will decouple the vritqueue > numbers from these functions. So you need to describe why such kind of decoupling is needed, > > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu > --- > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > index 36524a5728..2b7e6cc0d9 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > @@ -691,23 +691,17 @@ static void kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > } > > static int kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > - unsigned int queue_no, > + EventNotifier *n, > unsigned int vector) > { > VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector]; > - VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus); > - VirtQueue *vq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, queue_no); > - EventNotifier *n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > return kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier_gsi(kvm_state, n, NULL, irqfd->virq); > } > > static void kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > - unsigned int queue_no, > + EventNotifier *n , > unsigned int vector) > { > - VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus); > - VirtQueue *vq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, queue_no); > - EventNotifier *n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector]; > int ret; > > @@ -722,7 +716,8 @@ static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs) > VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev); > unsigned int vector; > int ret, queue_no; > - > + VirtQueue *vq; > + EventNotifier *n; > for (queue_no = 0; queue_no < nvqs; queue_no++) { > if (!virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, queue_no)) { > break; > @@ -739,7 +734,9 @@ static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs) > * Otherwise, delay until unmasked in the frontend. > */ > if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) { > - ret = kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(proxy, queue_no, vector); > + vq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, queue_no); > + n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > + ret = kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(proxy, n, vector); > if (ret < 0) { > kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector); > goto undo; > @@ -755,7 +752,9 @@ undo: > continue; > } > if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) { > - kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, queue_no, vector); > + vq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, queue_no); > + n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > + kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector); > } > kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector); > } > @@ -769,7 +768,8 @@ static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs) > unsigned int vector; > int queue_no; > VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev); > - > + VirtQueue *vq; > + EventNotifier *n; > for (queue_no = 0; queue_no < nvqs; queue_no++) { > if (!virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, queue_no)) { > break; > @@ -782,7 +782,9 @@ static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs) > * Otherwise, it was cleaned when masked in the frontend. > */ > if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) { > - kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, queue_no, vector); > + vq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, queue_no); > + n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > + kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector); > } > kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_release(proxy, vector); > } > @@ -791,12 +793,11 @@ static void kvm_virtio_pci_vector_release(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, int nvqs) > static int virtio_pci_vq_vector_unmask(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > unsigned int queue_no, > unsigned int vector, > - MSIMessage msg) > + MSIMessage msg, > + EventNotifier *n) So you switch to use EventNotifier but keep using queue_no/vector, this looks kind of duplication. If we can keep queue_no or virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier working as in the past, I don't see any reason for this effort. Thanks > { > VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus); > VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev); > - VirtQueue *vq = virtio_get_queue(vdev, queue_no); > - EventNotifier *n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > VirtIOIRQFD *irqfd; > int ret = 0; > > @@ -823,14 +824,15 @@ static int virtio_pci_vq_vector_unmask(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > event_notifier_set(n); > } > } else { > - ret = kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(proxy, queue_no, vector); > + ret = kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_use(proxy, n, vector); > } > return ret; > } > > static void virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > unsigned int queue_no, > - unsigned int vector) > + unsigned int vector, > + EventNotifier *n) > { > VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus); > VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev); > @@ -841,7 +843,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy, > if (vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask && k->guest_notifier_mask) { > k->guest_notifier_mask(vdev, queue_no, true); > } else { > - kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, queue_no, vector); > + kvm_virtio_pci_irqfd_release(proxy, n, vector); > } > } > > @@ -851,6 +853,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_vector_unmask(PCIDevice *dev, unsigned vector, > VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = container_of(dev, VirtIOPCIProxy, pci_dev); > VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus); > VirtQueue *vq = virtio_vector_first_queue(vdev, vector); > + EventNotifier *n; > int ret, index, unmasked = 0; > > while (vq) { > @@ -859,7 +862,8 @@ static int virtio_pci_vector_unmask(PCIDevice *dev, unsigned vector, > break; > } > if (index < proxy->nvqs_with_notifiers) { > - ret = virtio_pci_vq_vector_unmask(proxy, index, vector, msg); > + n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > + ret = virtio_pci_vq_vector_unmask(proxy, index, vector, msg, n); > if (ret < 0) { > goto undo; > } > @@ -875,7 +879,8 @@ undo: > while (vq && unmasked >= 0) { > index = virtio_get_queue_index(vq); > if (index < proxy->nvqs_with_notifiers) { > - virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask(proxy, index, vector); > + n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > + virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask(proxy, index, vector, n); > --unmasked; > } > vq = virtio_vector_next_queue(vq); > @@ -888,15 +893,17 @@ static void virtio_pci_vector_mask(PCIDevice *dev, unsigned vector) > VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = container_of(dev, VirtIOPCIProxy, pci_dev); > VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus); > VirtQueue *vq = virtio_vector_first_queue(vdev, vector); > + EventNotifier *n; > int index; > > while (vq) { > index = virtio_get_queue_index(vq); > + n = virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier(vq); > if (!virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, index)) { > break; > } > if (index < proxy->nvqs_with_notifiers) { > - virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask(proxy, index, vector); > + virtio_pci_vq_vector_mask(proxy, index, vector, n); > } > vq = virtio_vector_next_queue(vq); > }