From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99432C433E6 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 658D020707 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 658D020707 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=c-sky.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38208 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC38D-0003nt-IX for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:51:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC37b-0002tS-4B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:50:27 -0400 Received: from smtp2200-217.mail.aliyun.com ([121.197.200.217]:33258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kC37X-00013H-3G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:50:26 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.07585606|-1; CH=green; DM=|CONTINUE|false|; DS=CONTINUE|ham_regular_dialog|0.00675958-0.00045822-0.992782; FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01a16384; MF=zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=4; RT=4; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---.IPn1l-i_1598716193; Received: from 192.168.3.36(mailfrom:zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com fp:SMTPD_---.IPn1l-i_1598716193) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(10.147.42.135); Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:49:54 +0800 Subject: Re: [PULL 00/18] riscv-to-apply queue To: Alistair Francis , Peter Maydell References: <20200825184836.1282371-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> From: LIU Zhiwei Message-ID: <78f899b4-b8f8-9fc7-15a3-4d56d77bb960@c-sky.com> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 23:49:49 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: none client-ip=121.197.200.217; envelope-from=zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com; helo=smtp2200-217.mail.aliyun.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/29 11:05:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.809, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alistair Francis , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2020/8/26 6:30, Alistair Francis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:50 PM Peter Maydell wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 22:32, Alistair Francis wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:24 PM Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> The hypervisor related patches don't seem to have any >>>> reviewed-by tags, which seems a shame for a fairly significant >>>> chunk of work. Is there really nobody who can review them >>>> for you ? >>> Unfortunately not. They have been on the list since April and haven't >>> received any feedback. >>> >>> There isn't a lot of people reviewing the RISC-V patches unfortunately. >> :-( I'd hoped it was a more active target than that. > There are lots of active contributors, we are just short on reviewers. > > Richard and Philippe review patches and some of the RISC-V patches get > reviewed by the RISC-V community. The main problem (which is a common > problem in open source) is that large technical patch series just get > ignored. Hi Alistair, It's really a pity. I will review every patch that CC me in no more than a week if no other people reviewed this patch. So if there too many patches, just ease to CC me. Best Regards, Zhiwei > > Alistair > >> -- PMM