From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AC9CA9EAF for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8E8205C9 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="f+uUksne" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5B8E8205C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41642 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNcb1-0006s1-Vp for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:52:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNcGn-0005Uu-J7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:31:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNcGl-0003si-0N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:31:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]:35303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNcGj-0003q4-Ty; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:31:10 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id l10so25448912wrb.2; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:31:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=19BvcLrhC04drBgyMJbcXDRsFfZF8OsuOsMBpt+cX/g=; b=f+uUksneANaoDpO9i7UyLisFVxC0Sj76AGpkDqqLr4sTS6UCxGCrKFnASzMrhjmefR dXr2xJ6a5s5dsfQUeAxovjppld3/tqcP9PNYLwDx0TTEAkOFSuDAJWOR1QdOxJHZOSMG Yt7GZpXB2UKV3HwuLOHJT3Bi2UApYeupj9IJLgOLxzcR0CgZFU3OZGeHeUZAfCY4EgmN ao3xXdLBGDzqmsFsHejXA2yOOchKt9m0EgMfd+D2cRTm7gArQjhB6C6EMTsYJWH0k09g Ggtrb2ukJRx9lDua2ZPjSNKCpVlULGEL4Y2L+bcAcqMgmSj4P5VibfAyFyXtY1YXEkn/ 0kcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=19BvcLrhC04drBgyMJbcXDRsFfZF8OsuOsMBpt+cX/g=; b=O3O1oDcBsW7JVm5d4JPcR0EpyMj2Hr6U/V7LyGOBScDXLPd2uZV+gf4ZuXTYzAsQrj rEOzLCg4hOf1zAb6fVdGqxRDSZFoTrWiqaZkAIB7+Ol8IQJQYso1Ui4zMSPwNBrvXwrL Iun9SYZ+jn0nBPNfcq/VjqhyFJ5rbJ3qTPlTLOarbCgnwECeA5GG8wfNBW7ar1FfiWSZ mpuNFWWBsaoIR4ETqR7R/+UHKL7WU6i5jLs9vLhuAQoYc1QGDJR2G6U6zTsN3YN7QUbE Goajv/UY1V68kRpfE0Z0mY8Dg3HlAXleL2B70yu69UfoYGZgIGkpqlK79qsAhj0/+RDy KHFA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwdY+WLpf2AtpiI6a0QS9W5XeYRSzXkwf3KB5ORJEdcSy+GkBu 8uqSruymT1+xWV2VTW6NPy0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOEb7S0xXQCghJ+c1+W4+brbvJ1Wk03KzYHLtNGIIKOe47y0qgaBtNpdZxrBnW5kbqbXIGhQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:dc42:: with SMTP id m2mr3858484wrj.314.1571920267000; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Icho (x590ef5e8.dyn.telefonica.de. [89.14.245.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm26827645wrf.73.2019.10.24.05.31.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7aa51490869f8bbb8f5122b07e42a6c1f7da56ee.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/14] hw/arm/raspi: Add the Raspberry Pi 4B board From: Esteban Bosse To: Peter Maydell , Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:26:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20190904171315.8354-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <20190904171315.8354-15-f4bug@amsat.org> <5f1dd044-2909-767d-5a79-8a40d330e129@amsat.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::442 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Zolt=E1n?= Baldaszti , QEMU Developers , Andrew Baumann , qemu-arm , Clement Deschamps , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau , Paolo Bonzini , Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Pekka Enberg , Luc Michel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" El jue, 24-10-2019 a las 10:07 +0100, Peter Maydell escribió: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 10:04, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > wrote: > > Hi Esteban, > > > > On 9/29/19 5:53 PM, Esteban Bosse wrote: > > > > +static void raspi4_machine_init(MachineClass *mc) > > > > +{ > > > > + mc->desc = "Raspberry Pi 4B"; > > > > + mc->init = raspi4_init; > > > > + mc->block_default_type = IF_SD; > > > > + mc->no_parallel = 1; > > > > + mc->no_floppy = 1; > > > > + mc->no_cdrom = 1; > > > > + mc->max_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS; > > > > + mc->min_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS; > > > > + mc->default_cpus = BCM283X_NCPUS; > > > > + mc->default_ram_size = 1 * GiB; > > > The comercial models are: 1, 2 and 4 GiB. Why do you choose 1 GiB > > > as > > > default? > > > > Well need one default, and 1GiB is the least beefy :) > > You can start a VM with more using the '-m' switch. > > Among other things, a 2GB or more board will fail > 'make check' on a 32-bit host, because 'make check' tries > to start all board models, and 32-bit hosts can only > handle up to 2047MB of guest RAM. > > thanks > -- PMM Understood, thanks again for the info :).