qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net, integration@gluster.org,
	berto@igalia.com, pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru, dillaman@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, sw@weilnetz.de, pl@kamp.de,
	ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, mreitz@redhat.com, den@openvz.org,
	sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	namei.unix@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
	ari@tuxera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/17] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 14:09:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80c7747c-20e5-03ec-d31c-69168ae07920@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430111033.29980-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

On 4/30/20 6:10 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters
> on all io paths.
> 
> Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for
> fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk.
> 
> We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and
> with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means
> error).
> 
> So, convert tracked requests now.
> 
> Series: 64bit-block-status
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> ---

>   static void tracked_request_begin(BdrvTrackedRequest *req,
>                                     BlockDriverState *bs,
>                                     int64_t offset,
> -                                  uint64_t bytes,
> +                                  int64_t bytes,
>                                     enum BdrvTrackedRequestType type)
>   {
> -    assert(bytes <= INT64_MAX && offset <= INT64_MAX - bytes);
> +    assert(offset >= 0 && bytes >= 0 &&
> +           bytes <= INT64_MAX && offset <= INT64_MAX - bytes);

'bytes <= INT64_MAX' was previously a real runtime check, but is now a 
tautology and therefore a dead branch; a picky compiler might complain. 
This assert could be compressed to:

assert(offset >= 0 && (uint64_t) bytes <= INT64_MAX - offset);

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-22 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-30 11:10 [PATCH v3 00/17] 64bit block-layer Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] block/throttle-groups: throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept(): 64bit bytes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 15:28   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] block: use int64_t as bytes type in tracked requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 15:32   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-05-22 19:09   ` Eric Blake [this message]
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] block/io: use int64_t bytes parameter in bdrv_check_byte_request() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 15:57   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] block/io: use int64_t bytes in driver wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-11 16:30   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-08 18:20   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-11 17:17   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-05-11 18:34     ` Eric Blake
2020-06-23 10:20       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-06-23 16:37         ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-08 20:38   ` Eric Blake
2020-06-18 14:29   ` Alberto Garcia
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-21 22:29   ` Eric Blake
2020-05-22  6:30     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_aligned_preadv() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-22 15:14   ` Eric Blake
2020-06-18 14:35     ` Alberto Garcia
2020-06-18 14:47       ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read, write}v_part() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-22 19:34   ` [PATCH v3 09/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in bdrv_co_p{read,write}v_part() Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] block/io: support int64_t bytes in read/write wrappers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] block/io: use int64_t bytes in copy_range Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] block/block-backend: convert blk io path to use int64_t parameters Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-06-23 22:11   ` Eric Blake
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver read handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver write handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in copy_range driver handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver write_zeroes handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver discard handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-06  6:40   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 20:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] 64bit block-layer no-reply
2020-05-06  6:39   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-30 20:57 ` no-reply
2020-12-01 16:07 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-01 16:56   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-12-01 21:50   ` Eric Blake

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80c7747c-20e5-03ec-d31c-69168ae07920@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ari@tuxera.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=dillaman@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=integration@gluster.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@kamp.de \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).