From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HK_RANDOM_FROM,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7310AC35671 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CB62071E for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:41:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 42CB62071E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:40918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5RHX-0004LN-EI for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 04:41:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5RGg-0003q9-3v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 04:40:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5RGe-0001Gr-Q4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 04:40:13 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:2447 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5RGe-0000yA-E3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 04:40:12 -0500 Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 904FA3E0AA9FE18EA6AC; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 17:40:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.101) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 17:40:08 +0800 Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) by dggeme705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 17:40:07 +0800 Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.68]) by dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.68]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 17:40:07 +0800 From: miaoyubo To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: RE: [RFC v3 3/3] ACPI/unit-test: Add a new test for pxb-pcie for arm Thread-Topic: [RFC v3 3/3] ACPI/unit-test: Add a new test for pxb-pcie for arm Thread-Index: AQHV6IEd6Svy29h+HkqfrMST6pP6Uagk+maAgAH8DnA= Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:40:07 +0000 Message-ID: <817d9cb2699d4294a2ba4ae949079eea@huawei.com> References: <20200221063512.1104-1-miaoyubo@huawei.com> <20200221063512.1104-4-miaoyubo@huawei.com> <20200221061811-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200221061811-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.177.131.16] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 45.249.212.187 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "imammedo@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Xiexiangyou , "shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 7:19 PM > To: miaoyubo > Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com; Xiexiangyou > ; imammedo@redhat.com; > qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [RFC v3 3/3] ACPI/unit-test: Add a new test for pxb-pcie for= arm >=20 > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:35:12PM +0800, Yubo Miao wrote: > > From: miaoyubo > > > > Currently, pxb-pcie could be defined by the cmdline like > > --device pxb-pcie,id=3Dpci.9,bus_nr=3D128 However pxb-pcie is not > > described in acpi tables for arm. > > > > The formal two patches support pxb-pcie for arm, escpcially the > > specification for pxb-pcie in DSDT table. > > > > Add a testcase to make sure the ACPI table is correct for guest. > > > > Signed-off-by: miaoyubo >=20 >=20 > Please look at the top of tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c for how to add o= r > update tests. >=20 Thanks for replying, I didn't notice that, I would follow the steps to rebu= ild this patch. > > --- > > tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb | Bin 0 -> 34209 bytes > > tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 > > tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb > > > > diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb > > b/tests/data/acpi/virt/DSDT.pxb new file mode 100644 index > > > 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4eea3192c75ff28f7054d626 > a936 > > 3ca025b6c0ad > > GIT binary patch >=20 > I can't read this. >=20 I just have a question that is:=20 I just rebuild this aml with tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh and git send it or send the aml with attachment? > > literal 34209 > > > zcmeI*cXU+szJ~D)1PGxe5PG+us9-{YGz}UAMT!L#ks?x*Dx!d5hoIP > d > > > z?}}o>iWL;GW5HgrlKbvVM&HM??^)~qbMIProvd|8p2_U*%qO!m?AgcPkRQ( r)WX > > > zR3DKyBsMVKK5tZUEMJ#Z3xXj0I{cizY-H-_vUpxu>HLbszg^Hd* > > > zYT59@{GfDxK}u{$QSzH5MFX?4va_qcnOYVriD$G-YqqdX5KgQUqzA#0T0ymH9a > J-P > > zt=3D#;Qdf_)p=3DV$jH6t9{xXmH68P3ev)8EFlwrs(=3DX$_(9dxJh>6UU8FZi5vcVla%B= p > > > zz50)g^-pXvw4i9XAYFAU@nN}Xb+t___n%uw)` > 8L > > > z7F4goX88!*;pB+$X8&bG_2BOj*;OO*!h6xx&B+mI)uU#l*o>||BPVi3ji?#5Y(|dH > > > z=3DoUF6C2B^h&FJPcx<}5a88su#W_0%%JtAk+ikeZ+X7unGJtJq-j+)WHX7uzKy&`9 > % >=20 > ... Regards, Miao