qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "nsoffer@redhat.com" <nsoffer@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] enhance iotest 223 coverage
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:26:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8463a76e-74d7-7785-79f4-563cd78182a5@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190924143522.22902-1-eblake@redhat.com>

24.09.2019 17:35, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 506902c6 dropped non-iothread coverage in order to test iothread,
> better is to run things twice.  In doing this, I found it easier to
> edit the test when the log shows what commands were triggering various
> responses.

Did you consider adding -iothread to tests/qemu-iotests/check instead, to be
able to run any (or some) tests with or without iothread?

> 
> Eric Blake (2):
>    tests: Make iotest 223 easier to edit
>    tests: More iotest 223 improvements
> 
>   tests/qemu-iotests/223     | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   tests/qemu-iotests/223.out | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-24 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-24 14:35 [PATCH 0/2] enhance iotest 223 coverage Eric Blake
2019-09-24 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] tests: Make iotest 223 easier to edit Eric Blake
2019-10-07 12:05   ` Max Reitz
2019-10-07 20:06     ` Eric Blake
2019-10-08  9:04       ` Max Reitz
2019-09-24 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] tests: More iotest 223 improvements Eric Blake
2019-10-07 12:14   ` Max Reitz
2019-09-24 19:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2019-09-24 19:51   ` [PATCH 0/2] enhance iotest 223 coverage Eric Blake
2019-10-07 11:44     ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8463a76e-74d7-7785-79f4-563cd78182a5@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsoffer@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).