From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Cc: "Liang Yan" <lyan@suse.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Al Cho" <ACho@suse.com>
Subject: Re: latest GOOD state of series i386 cleanup, arm cleanup, s390 cleanup
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:02:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ra1crx4.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <198d8ef3-cc15-6f9d-6455-286748a705a8@suse.de>
Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
> On 5/18/21 4:02 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
>>
>>> On 5/17/21 11:53 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> due to my inactivity for a few weeks coupled likely with the upstream processes around qemu-6.0 now the series:
>>>>
>>>> 1) i386 cleanup
>>>> 2) arm cleanup and experimental kvm-only build
>>>> 3) s390 cleanup
>>>>
>>>> have become stale and hard to rebase on latest master.
>>>> This effect is compounded by the fact that lots of broken tests in
>>>> master have been added.
>>
>> Which tests are these? I know master suffers a bit from occasional
>> falling red but to my knowledge everything should be green (at least
>> from my last PR anyway ;-).
>>
>>>>
>>>> In the interest of not losing work,
>>>> I provide here the latest known good state of these series:
>>>>
>>>> For the i386 cleanup:
>>>> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/pipelines/293603386
>>>>
>>>> Tests started breaking horribly since about 1/2 weeks.
>>
>> The pipeline only shows one failed test (checkpatch) which is an
>> allowfail I believe. /me is confused.
>
> Hi Alex, yes, I pointed to the last pipeline that works :-)
>
>>
>>>> The latest version of the cleanup is reachable here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git branch "i386_cleanup_9"
>>>>
>>>> In my understanding, Paolo has now picked up this one.
>>>>
>>>> For the ARM cleanup and experimental kvm-only build:
>>>>
>>>> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/pipelines/293603376
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/qemu/qemu.git branch "arm_cleanup_v15"
>>>>
>>>> Again here tests started misbehaving in the same timeframe.
>>>>
>>>> The state of ARM cleanup is still experimental, maybe Liang or
>>>> Philippe you can adopt this one?
I've done a re-base onto the current master (and my testing/next):
https://github.com/stsquad/qemu/tree/review/arm_cleanup_v15
which is currently working it's way through my CI:
https://gitlab.com/stsquad/qemu/-/pipelines/306727076
As I've got patches waiting for this re-factor I'm happy to take the
series on if you've run out of time/patience ;-)
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 9:53 latest GOOD state of series i386 cleanup, arm cleanup, s390 cleanup Claudio Fontana
2021-05-17 9:54 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-05-17 10:11 ` Al Cho via
2021-05-18 14:02 ` Alex Bennée
2021-05-18 14:51 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-05-20 16:02 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2021-05-24 7:30 ` Cho Yu-Chen
2021-05-24 12:06 ` Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ra1crx4.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=ACho@suse.com \
--cc=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=lyan@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).