From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CBDC38A2A for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 20:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94E2208E4 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 20:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="uMpkwdDy" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E94E2208E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49914 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWnD5-00066q-6t for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 16:33:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWnCI-0005Iy-Fe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 16:32:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]:41234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWnCH-0007l6-8q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 16:32:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id g13so7983763wrb.8 for ; Thu, 07 May 2020 13:32:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+yJF/CZ1fUdX/0Oia0BgC7RlCNx505JWZhgHtx5BDuM=; b=uMpkwdDyc/OWCbhPW00Z5wvMxa9mS+S8A+jMnN4hcTJxf6a7SqiVJ5A9Q9yZUjfif0 0GvQTEkCGE/Us7jhTyJTWRG1nITC2eORe2hdr/LNjH+zGI1nIenW9WG/aDHBT8LfCJJp M3VejjGExqkYtY1ot0/NCp8lxj7h0KkY+U9uqrmTh0m9326veoLXkcc1s1r1jQ+wCnJe UPB+4Y+Qk/4vNFYFaUJxO35lezfYJvRAKX4DPP0GuraQGdOHrjV+A+Hj3RjxlsUvxkNw 7oC6oedgdIhiXa/SGwFR/Gm0N68MhufBA6+55QxNyxDg9UDN8iMUMjxGMfR3MU9uGb4x EdVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+yJF/CZ1fUdX/0Oia0BgC7RlCNx505JWZhgHtx5BDuM=; b=L14k8Qd1+h7kffxWYwqg9049mveezRzmnQ2PDVIKxzwDFHvgrLK3KBx2kJGhVCfME6 iMuo/UoZk0gPZNSY9aROxu8gSD6QM7hTe8gCKuvC2KJyLO86t61gWD/OLPuCX9vlGE+O v9WEszMLwju0nUypPsVZuZxLA7mVId1urF7kUrADXgcUQ+nGVOU8pEZfRxYNq4S8Dsp8 sdFsrQo2gOlF1YrgROVUOJqjk0rbeclZze+I2WsTeD3Dynj6m7wCzZk0nCoTzV+KvUch ovmLK5t1u9waxS22d9ZQ0vH8j8QADYx3C9SUkz/ELMG3MQCRe11Jmn+zvqihOrfkFWPX 0f9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZvvda9XihNCSfJDTMO8vi2AI1KmifrSzG/z0GwcgyqOSx3Ibgj amMGdqgBuYf7tp01WlxFfO35Kg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKPVrUgvejCzbXovhFrYFXdSeYeWpbNNwl7DDXCfIqvihgB9HltRXCvVmrVJFdGDava8OfM/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:46cf:: with SMTP id g15mr14032465wrs.276.1588883563501; Thu, 07 May 2020 13:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm9473806wrv.29.2020.05.07.13.32.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 May 2020 13:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA9B1FF7E; Thu, 7 May 2020 21:32:41 +0100 (BST) References: <20200507162235.1790-1-philmd@redhat.com> <874ksr615d.fsf@linaro.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.4; emacs 28.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/acceptance/boot_linux: Skip slow Aarch64 'virt' machine TCG test In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 21:32:41 +0100 Message-ID: <871rnv5vva.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::441; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x441.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Peter Maydell writes: > On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 19:38, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wr= ote: >> >> >> Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 writes: >> >> > The BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg is reported to take >7min to run. >> > Add a possibility to users to skip this particular test, by setting >> > the AVOCADO_SKIP_SLOW_TESTS environment variable: >> > >> > $ AVOCADO_SKIP_SLOW_TESTS=3Dplease make check-acceptance >> > ... >> > (05/88) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_= tcg: SKIP: Test takes >7min >> > ... >> >> 7m =3D 420s - I'm seeing: >> >> hyperfine "./tests/venv/bin/avocado run ./tests/acceptance/boot_linux.= py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg" >> Benchmark #1: ./tests/venv/bin/avocado run ./tests/acceptance/boot_lin= ux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg >> Time (mean =C2=B1 =CF=83): 162.179 s =C2=B1 3.138 s [User: 2= 04.726 s, System: 9.663 s] >> Range (min =E2=80=A6 max): 158.651 s =E2=80=A6 170.036 s 10 runs >> >> Is this on very slow hardware? > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-2145 CPU @ 3.70GHz 16-core > clang sanitizer build, which probably slows it down a bit. > > But even 200 seconds is an order of magnitude slower than any > of the other tests that check-acceptance runs. I think we > should be aiming for tests here to be ~30 seconds at most, > or the whole thing will take forever by the time we have > decent coverage of most machines. I think we could say the same for a whole bunch of the tests that are based on full distro downloads. What is this one running under the hood anyway? > > thanks > -- PMM --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e