From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA660C10F14 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8575220673 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="AbqOadE6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8575220673 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIW5m-00081a-O2 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:54:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIW4m-0007Xu-TG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:53:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIW4l-0004MD-GH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:53:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]:37685) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIW4l-0004Kh-8W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:53:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id p14so7299862wro.4 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:53:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f32hVp3FSibrA2UkcrKJBmex16vIbZTq6dXv/Rztk4k=; b=AbqOadE6DUYeox39s/KQNeElzQBcBEPjQdl3vxgpskhwIXvz3IWWPUWZj6SO8DlXGr nTx5zATwuGEnbZC92j9MU6MaY/ifU8kMiW1EbtzGhjpsVT6FSe2TMswVB53Fh8gATVKP 6FXTWU4g/pbzjLcanZfO7o6nHFW/eoqciqOjxr6gTWiLWYTEJjBEWhjpeF6Js7tCpZJ4 ZjZDBGGOurXos9pss9sE1YSohMEf6325Y9dCUECBFl3jCbdvDfWkaiZBlBOfMO2Mg48q jqgEhCNJucm7Lmo7+KDygIvFz/7hdRyl5AC0o4jlhFMriucdv4fXlJc4smqPdtZMAtJQ U/UA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f32hVp3FSibrA2UkcrKJBmex16vIbZTq6dXv/Rztk4k=; b=p0CTDbZmRqzsPJWouWGEKhACXn1C6OaUL/VGZ+iE3GDFB7tPVgA5bSQd5smJoGSBB4 c5RV282vM2SB/6DX2dfxRbcWpFgsHR7FvHKiGz3s1wA7kr5f/q9t0JgC/1giAzKl+6tc yBQDzpXKCG51D/xjpG3E4idLKseTm62K4jstHcEqfEKgUoaUdjqdQgfz5wa+rie+LOLo xg1m3TcGlMC1kEa0lYSY9GWY9xWIFW9v/2kApXgA33WGZktUPrAaF1E4WfpIqLWwHxQz cNsa1s6cpKl7sh+icPAxAjKSW3ok9zMu3exUXllyzL2Fv7UPhBmijNCfS3yUDmUn0BVY 2kRA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW8poGzEp0Pj+KC/sTtj5oXANdLAgSkW987730GCvopQCkoE8ks zbQwM0obtjq5+zEbvqLkgavVSQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxTL9rP6iL89kdAFuyl23hFv4jjm6k3KLZQUKWWXXfmKSyp5icr6u4/Cq+dc9FpTv0RoVHXlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:53c2:: with SMTP id a2mr7956947wrw.10.1570704821543; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2sm5425199wrp.11.2019.10.10.03.53.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2611FF87; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:53:40 +0100 (BST) References: <20191009170701.14756-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20191009170701.14756-6-thuth@redhat.com> <2238ed71-5811-c98f-03c8-f8804e480f9d@redhat.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.5; emacs 27.0.50 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] travis.yml: Compile on arm64, too In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:53:40 +0100 Message-ID: <8736g0na6j.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::442 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Peter Maydell , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Thomas Huth writes: > On 09/10/2019 21.06, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: >> On 10/9/19 7:07 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> Travis now features an arm64 build host, so let's check compilation >>> there, too. >>> >>> Unfortunately, there are some quirks: >>> - block/ssh.c does not compile properly in this environment, so we have >>> to use --disable-libssh until that problem is fixed. >>> - test-util-filemonitor fails, so we can not run the unit tests there >>> - The file system size seems to be very limited, so the iotest tests >>> can't be used and the hd-geo-test fails (thus we can't compile >>> x86_64-softmmu here and run "check-qtest" afterwards) >>> - Compiling seems to be quite a bit slower than on the x86 builders, >>> so we better limit the target list to some few architectures. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth >>> --- >>> .travis.yml | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml >>> index 0c88e8757b..357ca02890 100644 >>> --- a/.travis.yml >>> +++ b/.travis.yml >>> @@ -342,3 +342,9 @@ matrix: >>> - >>> CONFIG=3D"--target-list=3Dxtensa-softmmu,arm-softmmu,aarch64-softmmu,al= pha-softmmu" >>> >>> - TEST_CMD=3D"make -j3 check-tcg V=3D1" >>> - CACHE_NAME=3D"${TRAVIS_BRANCH}-linux-gcc-default" >>> + >>> + # Non-x86 builds: >>> + - env: >>> + - CONFIG=3D"--disable-libssh >>> --target-list=3Daarch64-softmmu,ppc64-softmmu,s390x-softmmu,x86_64-linu= x-user" >>> >> >> Is aarch64 on aarch64 interesting? >> >> Do you know if we can use KVM there? > > I don't think that KVM is usable there, but at least this should give us > some compile coverage for target/arm/kvm.c which we don't get > otherwise. We get compile coverage for !x86 kvm from the cross compilers on shippable. I'm more interested in running tests on !x86. > > Thomas -- Alex Benn=C3=A9e